RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-05 Thread Tyler Jensen
RUSTED-REVDNS test > (37) > X-Note: Weight: -110 - This E-mail was scanned by NETrends Systems > (www.netrends.com) for viruses and spam. > Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2003 10:40:53.0729 (UTC) > FILETIME=[42002510:01C3BB1C] > > -0- > > >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-05 Thread Mark Smith
FILETIME=[42002510:01C3BB1C] -0- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. > Scott Perry > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-05 Thread Mark Smith
4, 2003 2:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation > for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance 2003 RFC non-compliance > > > >I have a customer who was having trouble with his messages sent to > >users on servers that use spa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a customer who was having trouble with his messages sent to users on servers that use spam filters not being delivered. I had him send a message to me so I could see what tests it fails. As some of you may have already guessed, he's got a new pc with Outlook 2003 and the messages fail