: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
There is a fix for that issue. I guess I did no update the web site wiht
the link. I will do that.
download the following file and replace the files.
http://www.ssc-ips.net/HoldAnalyzer/DLAApp.zip
Kevin Bilbee
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:34 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
>
>
> FYI to the list, I have got Kevin's hold analyzer set up on my system
> now and it is working great. The
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
http://www.ssc-isp.net/HoldAnalyzer
I wrote this and made it available. Please send feedback. I have a newer
version that also works with smartermail and fixes a few bugs and
simplifies the admin GUI.
I ho
> I know from reading the list that some of you have set up
> your own automated systems that notify your users of held
> messages and allow them to requeue them automatically.
I think you mean "user based" and not automated reviev and requeuing.
That's what I've set up in the past month's
deHoldReports
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Lanard
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 1:11 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
Kevin,
How were you able to get by the rescann
lude the reports and
renames the application to DecludeHoldReports
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Lanard
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 1:11 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re:
Kevin,
How were you able to get by the rescanning of the email and allowing
it to be delivered in smartermail?
I am working on a web version of spamreview for smartermail and had
to use an ugly hack to get around it.
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
http://www.ssc-isp.net/HoldAnalyzer
I wrote this
Thanks Kevin. I'll try it out and give you feedback on it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 3:20 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
http://www.ssc-isp.net/HoldAnalyzer
I wrote this and made it available. Please send feedback. I have a newer
version that also works with smartermail and fixes a few bugs and simplifies
the admin GUI.
I hope to make the newer version availble by the end of the month or so.
Kevin Bilbee
> --
se them more by making them check mail in one place
(Outlook) and spam in another (Webmail).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Junk
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
Simpler for me, not them, though. I'm the one that understands how to
do the complicated stuff, not them, so I b
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated requeuing
Also, I don't like using AUTOWHITELIST because it is too easy (and
intuitive) to add their co-workers on the same domain (it IS a contact
list after all). This ends up causing
r all of them because one person had a co-worker's address
in their contact list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Automated
It would be much simpler to route the held mail to a junkmail mailbox, and
have the users use WebMail to check it. As an added benefit, they can
whitelist senders there by adding them to their contact list in WebMail.
It does require Declude Pro, however, to use the ROUTE action.
Darin.
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
