Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.

2006-11-27 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Chuck, I would look to add MxRate and FiveTen. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.

2006-11-27 Thread Gary Steiner
BLITZEDALL went offline in May (see http://opm.blitzed.org). Other than that, all the ones you are using I am also using. Other IP4R tests that I am using successfully that you are not: ADNSBL dnsbl.antispam.or.id BASURA bl.emailbasura.org CSMA-SBLbl.csma.biz IMP-SPAM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.

2006-11-27 Thread Andy Schmidt
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations. Darrell: Thanks for the recommendation. I have added MX Rate...Any particular one(s) of the fiveten lists. I Think we used them in the past but had some false positive issues. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations.

2006-11-27 Thread Chuck Schick
] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 12:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists Recommendations. BLITZEDALL went offline in May (see http://opm.blitzed.org). Other than that, all the ones you are using I am also using. Other IP4R tests

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists

2003-08-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have been receiving many messages that are not being caught by Junkmail and are not failing any tests. They are most certainly SPAM and are more than a little obnoxious. I want to blacklist messages of this kind, but want to be completely sure which is the best way. As an example, I have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists

2003-02-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have the ability to develop a whitelist by domain now, how about the ability to create a individual blacklist, say something like this in each junkmail file... WHITELISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\whitelist.txt BLACKLISTFILE C:\maillists\cswanson\blacklist.txt The catch here is while they

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLACKLISTS -

2002-11-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018 After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist to 7 and delete email at weight20. Which blacklist? What was it set to before you read that article? Why did you change it after reading that article?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLACKLISTS -

2002-11-18 Thread Smart Business Lists
SPAM, Monday, November 18, 2002 you wrote: S After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the S blacklist to 7 and delete email at weight20. This waters down the S blacklist a bit but removes the reliance...anyone else doing the S same or similar? I think I understand what

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BLACKLISTS -

2002-11-18 Thread SPAM
18, 2002 4:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLACKLISTS - http://www.informationweek.com/story/IWK20021115S0018 After reading this article, I changed our setup to weight the blacklist to 7 and delete email at weight20. Which blacklist? What was it set to before you

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists vs. Bogus Reply-To

2002-10-15 Thread David Delbridge
Thank you for the clarifications, Scott. To check the HELO/EHLO text (the domain that appears in the Received: header), you can set up a HELO filter (with Declude JunkMail Pro, using the latest release). But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS spammer.com which would

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists vs. Bogus Reply-To

2002-10-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
Thank you for the clarifications, Scott. To check the HELO/EHLO text (the domain that appears in the Received: header), you can set up a HELO filter (with Declude JunkMail Pro, using the latest release). But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS spammer.com which

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklists vs. Bogus Reply-To

2002-10-15 Thread Tom
But a filter requires the four-column format HELO 10 CONTAINS spammer.com which would require that we reformat any third-party blacklists each and every time we refresh the list, right? Yuck! Or is there a way to setup the HELO/EHLO filter against the aforementioned two-column blacklist