Todd,
1) Possibly. Still yes IMO.
2) Not presently.
3) Definitely, just help me make a list.
It is a little stickly, but my results showed it to not be
problematic. I am scoring this as only 30% of my fail weight, and DUL
lists can have similar false positive rates (only 2% in my
It was purposeful because I wanted to protect from false positives. If
there are enough of those, we could of course add tests or maybe even
mark the domain in some cases. It's helpful to also know their policy
on outbound SMTP and mail server hosting if available.
I think that the following
On Sep 17, 2003, at 8:21 PM, Matthew Bramble wrote:
I think that the following is a candidate for exclusion:
rrcs-nys-###-###-###-###.biz.rr.com
Matthew,
In the case of Road Runner I would put "ENSWITH rr.com" in the DYNAMIC and in the AntiDYNAMIC I would put "ENDSWITH biz.rr.com" because ba
I'm hoping that an anti-filter won't be necessary for this to work, but
it might be beneficial if there are some harder to detect strings like
the one you pointed out (if folks feel it is necessary).
The entry for counterbalancing Road Runner Business customers would be
as follows:
MAILFR
Actually, you don't get scored with this filter. You would need to
have dashes or dots on both sides of a number. Even if you did, you
would have a real tough time scoring anything over 1 coming to my
machine. Your mileage may vary of course.
Also, I can't see why it would be even workable
Oops, my bad, the 224 is a reference to your class B. That is dumb,
but at least they didn't make it look like a dial-up IP. You still
wouldn't score though :)
Matt
Matthew Bramble wrote:
Actually, you don't get scored with this filter. You would need to
have dashes or dots on bot
- A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS
entries
Oops, my bad, the 224 is a reference to your class B.
That is dumb, but at least they didn't make it look like a dial-up IP.
You still wouldn't score though :)MattMatthew Bramble
wr
/2003 - A new filter to
detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries
Actually, you don't get scored with this filter. You would need to have
dashes or dots on both sides of a number. Even if you did, you would
have a real tough time scoring anything over 1 coming to my m
Dan,
They are the latest that were published at this very moment. I have the
site design to the point though where I am going to start launching it
today. Probably within 2 hours I will have GIBBERISHSUB updated and
then move on from there. I will announce it on this list.
Matt
Dan Horne
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Bramble
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new
> filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reve
On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to
detect IP'd reverse DNS entries IP'd reverse DNS entries
Actually, you don't get scored with this filter. You would need
One thing that I'm looking into right now is the Declude server which is
at cpe-24-107-232-14.ma.charter.com. I'm thinking that "cpe" is for
customer premise equipment, and if that is exclusive to charter business
customers, it could be excluded. All we need are some Charter residential
cust
Thanks for the pointer on Charter. If I wasn't whitelisting you for
this listserv, you would still only score a -1 for most any message
because of negative weighting on your mx and legit content after failing
DYNAMIC.
Matt
R. Scott Perry wrote:
One thing that I'm looking into right now is t
13 matches
Mail list logo
