RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-13 Thread Dan Spangenberg
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky? The test email that I sent only had one recipient. The problem started when I sent the test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to test the filter setup. There was not a valid imail account or alias for muji. I waited a minute

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just intended recipients like you mentioned? Yes, in the next release, the ALLRECIPS filter option will work on both the intended recipient and actual recipient, so you won't have to have the account created on the server.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
I resent an email and declude has now gone somewhat wacky. The imail server was acting loaded, so I checked the task man and there are 6 or 8 instances of declude running - taking up all of the cpu cycles. Ther are also about 15-20 .~md and .smd files in the spool dir and three or 4 .vir

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-12 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I resent an email and declude has now gone somewhat wacky. The imail server was acting loaded, so I checked the task man and there are 6 or 8 instances of declude running - taking up all of the cpu cycles. Ther are also about 15-20 .~md and .smd files in the spool dir and three or 4 .vir

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
The test email that I sent only had one recipient. The problem started when I sent the test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to test the filter setup. There was not a valid imail account or alias for muji. I waited a minute for it to process and then checked the declude logs to see what had

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
The test email that I sent only had one recipient. The problem started when I sent the test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to test the filter setup. There was not a valid imail account or alias for muji. I waited a minute for it to process and then checked the declude logs to see what had

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing. It clearly doesn't like something with the filters. Here is what I have in the global.cfg WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing. What exactly is happening? WEIGHT100 weight x x 100 0 OLDEMPLOYEE filter f:\IMail\Declude\oldemployee1.txt x 100 0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Bill Landry
OLDEMPLOYEE filter f:\IMail\Declude\oldemployee1.txt x 100 0 and this is the content of the employee1.txt file: This may be a typo, but it does not appear here that the actual file name employee1.txt and the config option in the Global.cfg oldemployee1.txt are the same. Just something to look

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
, November 11, 2002 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky? I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing. What exactly is happening? WEIGHT100 weight

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Sorry, yes a typo. The filename did match the global.cfg line. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone