RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-22 Thread Kornitz, David
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail? On another topic, but somewhat related, we are looking for a way

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-21 Thread Kornitz, David
] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail? here a Declude log, version 1.78. Notice how it ends up with two different tests failed lines? Correct. There is one for each recipient. The second one lists much FEWER tests - but the same weight? Correct. That's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Since each recipient can receive a different score how are the messages handled? The way that SMTP works, a single E-mail can have multiple recipients. When this happens, it is expected that the E-mail be handled the same for everyone. Essentially everyone is sharing the same E-mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
here a Declude log, version 1.78. Notice how it ends up with two different tests failed lines? Correct. There is one for each recipient. The second one lists much FEWER tests - but the same weight? Correct. That's because only tests that have an action greater than LOG or have a weight

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail? here a Declude log, version 1.78. Notice how it ends up with two different tests

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
The receipients looked the same to me? It's hard to tell what happened. At LOGLEVEL HIGH, Declude JunkMail will record which log file was used for each recipient, which can help in determining what happened. I'm guessing it has something to do with SWITCHRECIP ON.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
That's because only tests that have an action greater than LOG ... are listed. Hm - did I hear this correctly? When I specify LOG then they do NOT appear in the LOG? That sounds contra-intuitive to me. The option should be called NOLOG, if that's what it does. It's one thing to hide actions

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
That's because only tests that have an action greater than LOG ... are listed. Hm - did I hear this correctly? Yes, I just didn't state it correctly; it should be greater than or equal to. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail? That's because only tests that have an action greater than LOG ... are listed. Hm - did I hear this correctly? Yes, I just didn't state it correctly; it should be greater than or equal

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Different Tests Failed for same mail?

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
But, when I specify LOG as an action then they do NOT appear in the LOG? They do. Only if the action is IGNORE *and* the weight is 0 will it not appear. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since