RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs (=> SORBS results)

2004-06-30 Thread Scott Fisher
I use sorbs-http with a last hop and a all hop configuartion. For June, the -ALL hit on 48 non-spam e-mails the -LAST hit on 27 non-spam e-mails. SORBS-HTTP-LAST dnsbl %IP4R%.dnsbl.sorbs.net 127.0.0.2 0 0 SORBS-HTTP-ALL ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs (=> SORBS results)

2004-06-30 Thread Andy Schmidt
Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 08:06 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs (=> SORBS r

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs (=> SORBS results)

2004-06-30 Thread Matt
Markus, Their open relay tests, SORBS-HTTP, SORBS-SOCKS and SORBS-SMTP can all hit on the same message for the same exploit causing a triple hit and therefore it is best to combo these tests with a custom filter.  Throwing in SORBS-MISC into this mix might also be a good idea. The problem isn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs (=> SORBS results)

2004-06-29 Thread Markus Gufler
Title: Message I have some other numbers. For example SORBS-HTTP   Yesterday it has had the correct result for 7% of the processed messages (776 of 11161 messages) But it has also had a positive (wrong) result for 17 legit messages. (so one of this messages was slightly above our hold treesho