Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-26 Thread Dan Patnode
: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs Thank you Matt. If correct, you've brought me more clarity and direction than I've had since this mess began. I've been so focused on fighting spam, I havn't yet installed Scott's AV system (after more than a year), relying instead on a basic Norton config

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Matthew Bramble
Dan, It appears that E-mail is first scanned by the virus scanner (F-Prot or whatever), and then if it passes, the excluded extensions are tested. So as soon as your virus scanner became Sobig.F aware, the excluded extensions test doesn't get done because it is blocked by the scanner. Maybe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs Dan, It appears that E-mail is first scanned by the virus scanner (F-Prot or whatever), and then if it passes, the excluded extensions are tested. So as soon as your virus scanner became Sobig.F aware, the excluded extensions test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Dan Patnode
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs   Dan, It appears that E-mail is first scanned by the virus scanner (F-Prot or whatever), and then if it passes, the excluded extensions are tested.  So as soon as your virus scanner became Sobig.F aware, the excluded

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Dan Patnode
Thank you Matt. If correct, you've brought me more clarity and direction than I've had since this mess began. I've been so focused on fighting spam, I havn't yet installed Scott's AV system (after more than a year), relying instead on a basic Norton config to handle things. Scott, Can you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Patnode Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs Thank you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Hermann Strassner
Scott,I know this is the wrong discussion group, but since we're on the topic, would it make more sense to test for banned extensions before it goes to the virus scanner in order to save processing power? Scott, please don`t do this. I forward messages with banned extension sometimes, and i

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Matthew Bramble
One of the beauties of using Declude plus F-Prot is that most desktops use either Norton or McAfee, and the release of the various definitions updates aren't instantaneous. I've seen F-Prot catch stuff that Norton isn't yet detecting and visa-versa. I have Norton also running on my server,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Hermann Strassner
I'm not saying that you are wrong to do what you do, just that I and many others consider the banned extensions a first line of defense for brand new viruses, and it is definitely necessary for good virus protection and causes no problems unless you are blocking more common extensions (like

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Karen D. Oland
Why do you update definitions so seldom? FProt updated the same day that SoBig.F started being circulated, from the experience of those on thsi list. -Original Message- From: Matthew Bramble I would have been letting Sobig.F through Declude plus F-Prot from Monday all the way through

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs I update 4 times a day with scheduling, but for some reason, this time it took a while for my server to get the update. I checked my logs and the definitions changed size at the time when it started detecting

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-25 Thread Matthew Bramble
, August 25, 2003 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs I update 4 times a day with scheduling, but for some reason, this time it took a while for my server to get the update. I checked my logs and the definitions changed size at the time when it started

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-23 Thread Dan Patnode
Thanks for all the great feedback. I'm still drowning in 50,000+ SoBig message/day but at least I now have them balanced over both 5gig servers instead of just one. What kills me is that the vast majority are headed for a single customers info@ address. Matt, by this: This does tie back

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
Dan, Declude does not have that kind of power as it is the IMAIL SMTP Daemon which accepts the mail and places it into the spool. After it is in the spool declude queue moves it to the overflow for faster processing if there are more messages in the spool than imail can run smtp-delivery

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:15 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs Dan, Declude does not have that kind of power as it is the IMAIL SMTP Daemon which accepts the mail and places it into the spool. After it is in the spool declude queue moves

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
|Netsmith Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 6:15 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs Dan, Declude does not have that kind of power as it is the IMAIL SMTP Daemon which accepts the mail and places it into the spool. After

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread Matthew Bramble
the toughest nut. -Original Message- From: Webmaster Oilfield Directory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs LOL! that's peanuts.. try 70,000 ...yes 70,000 per hour and then tell me about

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multi Server Configs

2003-08-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have a little less volume than you do, but it's amazing how concentrated the messages can be. My personal account which has many domains pointed at it has not received a single copy of the virus, but one account on our server has been hit over 500 times in the last 48 hours. We run