RE: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail

2005-04-15 Thread M Pilletere
PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail Personally, I have turned off Imail's anti-spam. There really is not anything there that Declude can't do or doesnt do better. I know some folks have a combination of both, bu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail

2005-04-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Personally, I have turned off Imail's anti-spam. There really is not anything there that Declude can't do or doesnt do better. I know some folks have a combination of both, but after looking over what Imail offers I did not see any added benefit to running it. Darrell ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail

2005-04-15 Thread Erik
om Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail I've turned off all of Imail's stuff. I also use Sortmonster's Message Sniffer and Invariant's Invuribl addons. - Original Message - From: "M Pilletere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail

2005-04-15 Thread Scott Fisher
I've turned off all of Imail's stuff. I also use Sortmonster's Message Sniffer and Invariant's Invuribl addons. - Original Message - From: "M Pilletere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 2:35 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail H

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail

2005-04-15 Thread Darin Cox
Nope...turn of IMail's anti-spam. Junkmail has everything there and much more. Darin. - Original Message - From: "M Pilletere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 3:35 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie question: imail antispam vs junkmail Hi, I just started usin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-07 Thread John Tolmachoff
Charles Frolick Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline I wrote a very simple batch file that runs nightly and holds mail for up to 10 days, alternately you could use a program called xxcopy that can delete, copy, or move

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-07 Thread Charles Frolick
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline I meant having to manually delete. One of these days I would like to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread John Tolmachoff
I highly recommend Sniffer, although we don't have it. I did the demo and liked the results. But with only about 300 mail boxes, I can not justify the cost to the boss. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread John Tolmachoff
Madscientist Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline | | Right now, because I am wearing so many hats, I have not had | a chance to look at and use programs to delete the held | messages after 5 days, which is when I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread Madscientist
| | Right now, because I am wearing so many hats, I have not had | a chance to look at and use programs to delete the held | messages after 5 days, which is when I manually delete them. | | I hold all, then after 5 days if no one has complained about | where is my e-mail, I manually delete.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread Madscientist
We have similar circumstances in the email systems that we host. We currently trap more than 80% of incoming messages as spam with our Message Sniffer software. The average for all reporting systems is something just over 70%. I think Declude w/ Message Sniffer is the way to go if you have an Ima

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread Cris Porter
pient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cris Porter Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread Keith Purtell
r by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cris Porter Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline I've

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread Cris Porter
I've been using Junkmail for a little over a year. I've continued using I-mail rules also. I've made 2 changes that cut down my spambox tremendously. 1) We subscribed to Sniffer and gave it a weight high enough to hold anything tripping it. 2) I've been slowly moving my catchphrases from I-mail r

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question about baseline

2002-10-04 Thread John Tolmachoff
Right now, because I am wearing so many hats, I have not had a chance to look at and use programs to delete the held messages after 5 days, which is when I manually delete them. I hold all, then after 5 days if no one has complained about where is my e-mail, I manually delete. John Tolmachoff IT

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie Question

2002-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Does this BLACKLIST need an entry to both glogal.cfg & the junk_mail >configuration file? It works like all the other tests, so it needs to be defined in the global.cfg file, and then you can set the action to use on the test in the global.cfg file (for outgoing/relayed mail), or the $default

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie Question

2002-09-20 Thread George Thompson
Does this BLACKLIST need an entry to both glogal.cfg & the junk_mail configuration file? Thanks. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ne

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie Question

2002-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Being that I am very new to Declude Junkmail what are the steps in order >to configure a kill list. I have a kill list so what are the steps in >order to activate it. "Kill List" normally refers to IMail's "kill.lst" file (although some people also use it to refer to Declude JunkMail's "Send

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie Question about the Kill list posted here

2002-08-02 Thread Tom
> Newbie question - this kill list is used in Imail program - not Declude? No this kill list is for Declude specifically, however, with proper manipulation it can be used with Imail's kill list. Regards, Tom Image`fx --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.c

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question

2002-02-21 Thread Matt Robertson
] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question >I noticed in the Declude product comparisons that per-domain >configuration is possible in the standard version. That's correct. >Does that mean I can get Declude to effectively not process mail for a >*recipient* domain? Yes. &g

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question

2002-02-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I noticed in the Declude product comparisons that per-domain >configuration is possible in the standard version. That's correct. >Does that mean I can get Declude to effectively not process mail for a >*recipient* domain? Yes. >I must have missed how to do this in the manual if so. I know h

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Todd Ryan
Hey! Thanks for all the quick, helpful responses. In case anyone is interested, here's what I figured out... I set up a ]TEST]alert.eml for each test type. In the file, I put: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: postmaster@%LOCALHOST% Subject: [SPAM] Failed: %TESTSFAILED%

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Madscientist
] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry | Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:39 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question... | | | | >While testing...I'd like to do something similar to WARN and HOLD at the | >same time. That is, let the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread Madscientist
What if you were to hold them, but then set up a scheduled job that runs once per hour or so. That job would: 1. copy all held messages back to the queue for delivery. 2. move all held messages into a review directory (to clear the hold area for next time. The result would be almost the same (ex

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question...

2002-02-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
>While testing...I'd like to do something similar to WARN and HOLD at the >same time. That is, let the message go through but keep a copy for >evaluation when I have time. This could be either in the \spool\spam folder >or forwarded/copied to a dummy account and checked via email. This isn't p

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question

2001-12-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
>My question is, can you pick and choose which tests you want Declude to >perform, or are they all done by default? Yes, you can pick and choose. By default, all the tests that Declude has defined are run, except for the ones that require a subscription or normally would not be used for some