or the domain
to be specifically configured to refer to the ISPs SPF records.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Scott
Fisher
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Records and Off-Network
Customers
Here are some of my stats t
e.JunkMail] SPF
Records and Off-Network Customers
I believe that SPF is almost all hype and hardly any value to
speak of.It was originally intended to authenticate hosts, but
spammers quickly caught on and started giving themselves SPF records ( http://netscape.com.com/2100-1009_22-53
used, this is an indispensable test.
While I wish SPF Pass was worthwhile as well, I'll
take what good I can get out of it.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF Records an
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I believe that SPF is almost all hype and hardly any value to speak of.
It's not hype - if you use it correctly it can provide some positive
results. After all other spam filtering was done (Postfix, SpamAssassin,
Razor, Pyzor, DCC
I believe that SPF is almost all hype and hardly any value to speak of.
I think this is a bit harsh. While SPF is certainly not the answer to all of
my prayers, it has some value.
It was originally intended to authenticate hosts, but spammers quickly
caught on and started giving t
I believe that SPF is almost all hype and hardly any value to speak of.
It was originally intended to authenticate hosts, but spammers quickly
caught on and started giving themselves SPF records (
http://netscape.com.com/2100-1009_22-5357269.html?part=netscape&subj=technews&tag=mynetscape
).
- Original Message -
From: "David Dodell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For your hotel situation, you might try setting your mail server to
accept
> > SMTP AUTH traffic on port 587. That way if 25 is blocked but 587 is
open
> > you can continue to use your mail server.
>
> I thought Imail only
Saturday, September 11, 2004, 7:37:21 AM, Darin Cox wrote:
> For your hotel situation, you might try setting your mail server to accept
> SMTP AUTH traffic on port 587. That way if 25 is blocked but 587 is open
> you can continue to use your mail server.
I thought Imail only has the capability o
Yes. One of the flaws of SPF. However, you can also use a weaker SPF
record that says basically that you don't know what mail server it is coming
from. Not much point in that except to say that you're using SPF, though I
suppose it might be possible that a particular mail admin might penalize
si
