be more cost effective for you.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kemp [mailto:KempT@;controlconceptsinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than Declude
I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and
I appreciate the offer. I put it forth to my Boss and the other Tech on
this project. I don't think that they should give up on this yet...but they
think otherwise. If I can manage to convince them to go forward, I will
take you up on your offer.
If, in fact, they do choose to give it another sh
OTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than
Declude..transferred from Imail forum
>... they apparently were having issues where those filt
om:
Tom Kemp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:14
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something
better than Declude..transferred from Imail forum
Thanks, that is actually the avenue that they were
taking. They got themessages to appear with the chang
>You're going to force me into looking into this situation closer, aren't
you? I've been tempted...just trying to finish up a couple of other things
before I do that.
Yes. :))
Help is here.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.relia
002 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something better than
Declude..transferred from Imail forum
>If we filter what we know is junk, somebody in upper management will get
upset because they missed their latest 'junk' mail. That is why we wanted a
per-user type of
>If we filter what we know is junk, somebody in upper management will get
upset because they missed their latest 'junk' mail. That is why we wanted a
per-user type of interface...so that those people can manage their own junk.
Actually, what you may want to try is the attach function, which atta
I'm moving this discussion into the Declude forum, where it belongs...
Markus Gufler stated:
>I'm not sure if this is "per-user-.self-config-frontend" is really needed
>for declude.
>Our users are very happy when we try to find a good and reliable
>configuration and keep them up to date. (spamme
