lack of personal involvement in the
validation and verification process, and like Mark said, "an inaccurate
system is worse than no system."
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2
May be a commercial enterprise will be more open to adding a "hands-off"
reporting system. Manually confirming every spam that I already determined
as spam makes the system not practical.
What they need is a commercial (for fee) account which includes the
(revocable) right to submit directly int
Sure... if all they do is provide cash such that the spamcop services
provides don't go down due to lack of funding, that will be a good thing.
If they also take over some of the operations, then Matt would get his wish
and they could afford to put in place some filters to make their service
less
IronPort owns the bondedsender.com whitelist service, as well, and I have
had good results using their ip4r service. So this sounds like it could be
a good combination of services.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesd
Even though they say that it will remain free, it seems like good
business sense for them. The value of SpamCop, imperfect as it is,
still is immense and only MailPolice would seem to be able to carry on
that torch. Hopefully with just a little more effort, they can clean up
some of their iss
