Re: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-28 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
th us for that very fact they feel safer that we enforce those rules.. Ty it you'll be surprised. - Original Message - From: "Karen Oland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [D

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-28 Thread Karen Oland
> In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an > Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire > someone for conduct that they didn't agree to abide by and if it came to > a lawsuit they would probably loose. In fact, in TN, a long-haul trucker won a worker's co

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of > Ethics > > > In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an > Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire > someone for conduct that they didn't a

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread David Stavert
Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A > Question of Ethics > > > The term "spyware" r

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Keith Purtell
ruary 27, 2003 8:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of > Ethics > > > I suppose you can say that any monitoring tool or piece of software > could be spyware. I know in several instances where > employee's were

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Brian Milburn
On 02/27/03 9:32am you wrote... > >>>I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse >>>classification. Yet in your "several dozen cases where divorces were >>>contemplated, employee terminations took place, even people who were >>>sent back to prison" and "kids w

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Darrell L.
>>I'll trust you on that, and apologize for the roundhouse >>classification. Yet in your "several dozen cases where divorces were >>contemplated, employee terminations took place, even people who were >>sent back to prison" and "kids who have been grounded" examples, >>clea