you shouldn't proceed under the assumption that government
regulators are out there giving IT staff lists of words to be used
in full-text search of E-mail archives. That is not the law, and
it is not how subpoenas are issued.
First: I clearly noted that legal (or
Each company is different and therefore so are their needs.
Okay, but _Rick's_ needs are SOX compliance. I don't have any interest
in discussing general archiving methods; to each his/her own in that
effort.
Many that archive will never need to go through the data, primarily
because many
Show me a search of a full text index that can positively give you
100% of the hits on a given topic and I'll let you have this one :)
The regulators will typically give you a list of search terms to be
used in a full-text search. Their specifications are what guide the
accuracy of
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 10:44:32 PM, Matt wrote:
M Patrick Childers wrote:
Hi Pete,
I think your gut is right. I'm pretty sure that I have 2 clients that would
be quite interested in SOXsniffer. g
M Not to debate the applicability of the technology, but you shouldn't
M proceed under
I will look into those, the boss wants me to do this on the cheap,
the sql idea was first so we could at least say we were archiving
the email.
If you just want archiving for independent audit and to show good
faith, concatenate the Q and D into an envelope-preserving MBOX for
...
Not sure if that helps but that's what we did for archiving/searching.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:47 PM
To: Rick Davidson
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining
If it were me I would just use the CATCHALLMAILS feature of Declude
and COPY them to an archival e-mail address and then just burn the
inbox of that address to disk once a month.
For low-volume and unregulated businesses, perhaps, but this will not
accomplish compliance, since:
- it
-
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:33 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining a BCC Recipient
If it were me I would just use the CATCHALLMAILS feature of Declude
and COPY them to an archival e-mail address
-
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rick Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:46 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Determining a BCC Recipient
I will look into those, the boss wants me to do this on the cheap,
the sql idea was first so we could at least
I strongly recommend that you just simply keep these in their Q* and
D* formats and zip up the directories every night and write them to
a CD or something every so often.
Like I keep trying to say, this isn't an every so often or
best-effort regulation. It's strict and for-real.
.
10 matches
Mail list logo
