Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS

2005-01-24 Thread David Sullivan
Hello Darrell, Monday, January 24, 2005, 5:38:51 PM, you wrote: Dsic> We do the same thing. One thing you can do is fake mail coming in. I use a Dsic> batch file. Dsic> REM THIS WILL CLEAN OUT THE DECLUDE QUEUE Thanks we'll give it a shot. This should be a great help. -- Best regards,

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about Windows 2003 DNS

2005-01-24 Thread David Sullivan
Declude Queue is nice and was invaluable before the Queue Manager service on Imail. The only problem is this: RSP> than X. At that point, when an E-mail arrives, Declude will start enough RSP> Declude processes to hit the limit of X (each of which scans a single E-mail). DQ requires a continue

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> Why they don't answer with an 5xx code? There was one single "531 - > Mailbox has exceeded disk quota" today... Because they're stupid. They don't want to wait, so they just keep it comin' 1/2 hour later. >> If the server terminates the session and blacklists you temporarily >> or permanently

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory

2003-01-07 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> So there are a lot of msgs where the remote mailserver after some > mb's of transfered data terminates the trasmission. Any mail server that terminates the session instead of sending a 5xx is broken, as it's just inviting more waste on both sides. If the server terminates