RE: [Declude.Virus] Faster second scanner needed

2004-03-30 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
FYI, I did some heavy talking with a contact at Kaspersky about 1 1/2 ago regarding using their product to integrate into a product I was trying to develop, but did not get off the ground. They are very helpful and courteous. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You

Re: [Declude.Virus] Faster second scanner needed

2004-03-30 Thread Adrian Hauri
AVG takes about 4 seconds to fire up the AV Engine and scan. I'm running the 16bit version 6 of AVG. I would recommend you to use McAfee. I use version 4.32 for more than a year now and it is as fast as F-Prot. Also it was the first and only AV scanner for several days who was able to detect

Re: [Declude.Virus] Faster second scanner needed

2004-03-30 Thread Matt
Adrian, This is helpful, however the control is different as mine was based on the 32 bit version of F-Prot (fpcmd.exe). It appears from your logs that 16 bit F-Prot beat out 32-bit McAfee by 50% or more. I'm not sure if the F-Prot being 16 bit had all that much effect, but one would expect

Re: [Declude.Virus] Faster second scanner needed

2004-03-30 Thread Adrian Hauri
, the proportions in the time consumption should be similar. Adrian - - Original Message - From: Matt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Faster second scanner needed