> As you have discovered when multiple recipients are in place,
> if one of then sends the request, the message is released for
> all of them. In my opinion I consider it as a minor glitch.
..until there is spreading a real virus using such a vulnerability.
The worst case: A Worm that uses the
g what mistakes the user could have done
%imailpath%\imail1 -f %imailpath%\unblock_email_error.txt -s "Error
while unblocking E-mail:%subject%" -t "%sender%" -u
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:end
endlocal
<<< End >>>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
BTW: I've attached to this mail a short ASP-Script that requeues a
spoolfile from the virus folder.
Simply set a link in your vulnerability.eml file to
http://www.yourdomain.com/requeue.asp?id=%QUEUENAME%
The recipient of the vuln.warning can simply click on this link to
requeue the hold message
> Yes -- http://www.declude.com/virus/manual.htm has a section on
> vulnerabilities, that has a brief description of each one.
Thanks. It's exaclty what we need.
> The information in the manual should be enough for the programmers to
> figure out the problem (if they can't, they shouldn't be
>Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability
"It is possible to send attachments to Outlook Express users using
non-standard attachment techniques. This can be accomplished by
encapsulating the data in Carriage Return () specifiers in the
Subject line of an email. Upon receiving an email with a subject line
conta
Is there a information page where you explain the different
vulnerabilities and what are tipical causes of this?
Yes -- http://www.declude.com/virus/manual.htm has a section on
vulnerabilities, that has a brief description of each one.
We have here a lot of hold messages with:
Outlook '
In my recent experience...
>Outlook 'CR' Vulnerability
"It is possible to send attachments to Outlook Express users using
non-standard attachment techniques. This can be accomplished by
encapsulating the data in Carriage Return () specifiers in the
Subject line of an email. Upon receiving an emai
