on 4/30/04 12:41 PM, Jeffrey Di Gregorio wrote:
> Does anyone have a suggestion on what to do about the growing number of auto
> reply messages being received by clients because of the current amount of
> forging viruses. I am getting daily complaints from clients who say they
> never sent anythi
D] On Behalf Of System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] blocking auto reply messages
on 4/30/04 12:41 PM, Jeffrey Di Gregorio wrote:
> Does anyone have a suggestion on what to do about the growing number
> of auto reply messag
- returned messages should have the original headers so I'm
looking for the >>beginning of an IP address
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of System Administrator
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
on 5/6/04 10:10 AM, Douglas Cohn wrote:
> Why are we looking for the beginning of an IP address?
Our users were receiving a lot of messages like this ...
>> Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> Original message follows.
>>
>> Received: from 0016190464.com [67.96.70.122] by mx2.acsworld.ne
Greg,
I like your thinking very much here. Unfortunately this requires
knowing all the possible outgoing servers for all of your clients, and
because I'm gatewaying a bunch of E-mail, that is near impossible to
keep up with. I'm not about to give up on the idea though.
My BOUNCER filter tha
on 5/6/04 10:10 AM, Douglas Cohn wrote:
> Why are we looking for the beginning of an IP address?
Our users were receiving a lot of messages like this ...
>> Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> Original message follows.
>>
>> Received: from 0016190464.com [67.96.70.122] by mx2.acsworld.ne
How is the below implimented?
Tks
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2004 9:14 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] blocking auto reply messages
Excellent observation and thinking
