Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-13 Thread Neven MacEwan
recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 14 July 2000 08:55 Subject: Re: [DUG]: Midas again > > Jeez Phil you must be over 40! I bow to your superior sufferings > > Or my superior dementia? Sadly 43 is approaching fast. Maybe too many > brain cells h

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-13 Thread Phil Scadden
> Jeez Phil you must be over 40! I bow to your superior sufferings Or my superior dementia? Sadly 43 is approaching fast. Maybe too many brain cells have died to do programming much longer and its time to get into management. (Its just that these whippersnappers code so slow) -

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Neven MacEwan
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2000 14:56 Subject: Re: [DUG]: Midas again > > What is huge about 96bits? in storage it is shorter than your name > > Well multiply it by 12 million records and a 32bit key looks a lot more > attactive > > > Now Sonny I remember

RE: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread James Sugrue
53 To: Multiple recipients of list delphi Subject: RE: [DUG]: Midas again On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, James Sugrue wrote: > Luxury. In my day, had to sleep in cardboard box. Walk ten miles in driving > snow to get to school, where teacher would beat us Aye... stoop ya winging lad, 'least ye

RE: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Mark Derricutt
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, James Sugrue wrote: > Luxury. In my day, had to sleep in cardboard box. Walk ten miles in driving > snow to get to school, where teacher would beat us Aye... stoop ya winging lad, 'least ye 'ad a sckool... in my day... -- Inspired by the taste of horror, proud to be i

RE: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread James Sugrue
recipients of list delphi Subject: Re: [DUG]: Midas again > What is huge about 96bits? in storage it is shorter than your name Well multiply it by 12 million records and a 32bit key looks a lot more attactive > Now Sonny I remember in '85 I wrote a whole control system in Turbo Pascal >

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Mark Derricutt
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Phil Scadden wrote: > HP in something like Basic in 1980. (And then there was the finite > element modeller in Algol on the old Burroughs in 1978 before > that...). I come over and teach you but my walking stick is broke. Ahhh the joy and humor senility (sp?) brings is astou

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Phil Scadden
> What is huge about 96bits? in storage it is shorter than your name Well multiply it by 12 million records and a 32bit key looks a lot more attactive > Now Sonny I remember in '85 I wrote a whole control system in Turbo Pascal > that ran in a 48K TPAwhats a TPA!!.. I think my hearin aids

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Phil Scadden
> Suggestion - Put Ethenet Cards in the laptops and use the unique ID as part of > your key no setup, no poss of collision True enough but then the main application on the server has these huge 96bit keys. Can use a simplier no. but think you have to still have to convert the ID in Applyupdate/

RE: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-12 Thread Myles Penlington
--Original Message- > From: Phil Scadden [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:07 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > Subject: [DUG]: Midas again > > We are (yet again) considering Midas - for a system that has to run > immediate

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-11 Thread Nic Wise
ROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:07 PM Subject: [DUG]: Midas again > We are (yet again) considering Midas - for a system that has to run > immediately following major disaster (especially earthquake) where > networks, telecoms and power are unlikely to be immediately availab

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-11 Thread Peter G Jones
pendencies. >From: "Phil Scadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [DUG]: Midas again >Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 17:07:14 +1200 > >We are (yet again) considering Midas - for

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-11 Thread Aaron Scott-Boddendijk
> We are (yet again) considering Midas - for a system that has to run > immediately following major disaster (especially earthquake) where > networks, telecoms and power are unlikely to be immediately available. > > The attraction of Midas this time is that independent laptops could be used >

Re: [DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-11 Thread Neven MacEwan
y 2000 17:07 Subject: [DUG]: Midas again > We are (yet again) considering Midas - for a system that has to run > immediately following major disaster (especially earthquake) where > networks, telecoms and power are unlikely to be immediately available. > > The attraction of Midas th

[DUG]: Midas again

2000-07-11 Thread Phil Scadden
We are (yet again) considering Midas - for a system that has to run immediately following major disaster (especially earthquake) where networks, telecoms and power are unlikely to be immediately available. The attraction of Midas this time is that independent laptops could be used for dataentr