-Original Message-
From: delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] On
Behalf Of Jolyon Smith
Sent: Friday, 16 October 2009 8:59 a.m.
To: todd.martin...@gmail.com; 'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List'
Subject: Re: [DUG] Unicode [redux]
Instead o
ng Integer
itself 64-bit).
(*) see next email
-Original Message-
From: delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-boun...@delphi.org.nz] On
Behalf Of Jeremy North
Sent: Friday, 16 October 2009 12:09 p.m.
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List
Subject: Re: [DUG] Unicode [redux]
Under what circumstances would you want to use the $H- option now? For
recompiling old code? Perhaps it should now be deprecated as well.
Time to update that really old code or just leave it in an older
version. I personally have a number of projects that I won't upgrade
for various reasons.
I fin
> What can I say
>
> http://blogs.embarcadero.com/abauer/2009/10/08/38901
>
> (I didn't mean you specifically)
>
Oh, I'd never even noticed that post. I should really start up feed
demon more often these days. Then again, I'm more interested in the
engadget posts that anything else I've subs
> You're fast putting me off upgrading.
I think all I'm doing is voicing the reasons that many people are *already* put
off upgrading.
Instead of threatening to withdraw upgrade rights I think Embarcadero could
improve upgrade take-up by simply offering a free copy of Delphi 2007 to
everyone u
Hi Jolyon
> The problem is that what we're stuck with is a mess, so all we can do is
> talk about the mess as a way of finding our way out of it (in the sense that
> by talking about the mess we might one day understand the mess well enough
> to be able to live with it).
You're fast putting me of
>> (for some reason people seem to prefer to come up with their own
>> ideas about what I think).
>
> Don't flatter yourself. I don't really care what you think at all ;-)
What can I say
http://blogs.embarcadero.com/abauer/2009/10/08/38901
(I didn't mean you specifically)
> How would suc
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jolyon Smith wrote:
> Jeremy:
>
>> Separate Ansi and Unicode VCLs are not a viable solution.
>
> Straw man argument (but incidentally, do you believe separate Windows
> specific and X-Platform VCL's *ARE* a viable solution? h...?) ;)
Have never made public m
Yeah I think we might do that.
Robert Martin
Software Engineer
Wild Software Ltd
- Original Message -
From: "Stacey Verner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:36 PM
Subj
Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:19:12 +1200
Subject: RE: [DUG]: Unicode
> It depends on what OS you are using. I think that NT4 and Win2k by
> default
> support it but earlier versions of windows
What about using an image?
Then you don't have to rely on the font being there.
Stacey
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 2:25 p.m.
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject
e-
From: "Robert Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:06:46 +1200
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Unicode
> Dont think you need to go you?
>
> Robert Martin
> Software Engineer
> Wild Softwa
.
Robert Martin
Software Engineer
Wild Software Ltd
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Vergara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Unicode
> S
in
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 14:07
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Unicode
>
>
> Dont think you need to go you?
>
> Robert Martin
> Software Engineer
> Wild Software Ltd
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nahum Wild&
Dont think you need to go you?
Robert Martin
Software Engineer
Wild Software Ltd
- Original Message -
From: "Nahum Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject
ultiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Unicode
> It is supposed to be a solid downwards pointing arrow (as in the ones
used
> in outlook express). The font may need to be set to arial to get the
> cor
>
> To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Unicode
>
>
> > > I would like to display a unicode character in a TLabel. I tried
> > > Label.Caption := WideStrToStr
means 25BC Hex and converts to 9660 decimal.
Robert Martin
Software Engineer
Wild Software Ltd
- Original Message -
From: "Nello Sestini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:0
> I would like to display a unicode character in a TLabel. I tried
> Label.Caption := WideStrToString(#9660) but I get a '?' instead of
> the character I am after. Ideas?
procedure TForm1.Button3Click(Sender: TObject);
const w:widestring = #9660;
begin
label1.caption:='abc'+w+'def
19 matches
Mail list logo
