I completely agree with this part.
If you want to make stuff really thin, then you must at some stage cache
data on the users (client) PC and only update it when there is a change in
the same data on the server - this can be very effective for all those
lookup tables that don't change very often
How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
(Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe in
a single day. Just interest at this stage - don't let cost be an
Yes please Richard
Max
[Richard Said]
How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
(Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe
in
a single day. Just interest
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Max Renshaw-Fox wrote:
How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
(Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe
I'd be in, as long as
--Original Message-
From: Richard Vowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, 3 September 1999 7:50 AM
Subject: CORBA (was Re: [DUG]: Thin Database Components.)
Nic Wise wrote:
Remember, and Annie will hate me for saying this, but Delp
Hi Tony,
Tony Blomfield wrote:
1. Is this really "Thin" technology is per my earlier goal statement.
Not sure what your earlier goal statement was - see my comment about coming into
the thread 1/2 way.
2. Financially the only winners in this race are Borland. From what I read
there is
Hi,
Richard wrote:
How many people would be interested in a day course on CORBA and MIDAS?
(Probably Auckland + Wellington) If I get some serious feedback, then I can
probably convince Annie to put it on... We can cover all the bases I believe in
a single day. Just interest at this stage -
On 3/09/99 at 20:46 Tony Blomfield wrote:
There seemws to be very little mileage in going this way.
1. Is this really "Thin" technology is per my earlier goal statement.
Which was the reduction of network traffic, right? Then sure - it can be as thin (or
fat) as you want to make it.
2.