I think a high level roadmap, showing how we get from here to 1.0, will help a
lot:
* it will give users confidence that their favourite feature will be added
* it will give people planning new projects based on CDI an understanding of
when they can start adding DeltaSpike to their project, and
I'd like to re-open the discussion on documentation format, as there
seems to have been a decision slip through the cracks on this that many
of us missed. My greatest concern is that the selected tool needs to
meet the requirements stated in DELTASPIKE-13 [1]. Does the choice of
Apache CMS
Reposting some info I mentioned on IRC wrt the CMS.
Generally if you're ok with doing things page-at-a-time and keeping the
markdown, asciidoc or whatever source in svn, all can work fine.
The CMS can keep the site up-to-date immediately after each commit of a source
file (*.mdtext,
The answer to both these questions really that the CMS creates websites, some
details on that below
I'll note that the CMS is svn based -- maybe undesirable given the use of git.
On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
Does the choice of Apache CMS for hosting documentation meet the
