for quite some time and afair we settled on jul.
jul is for sure not the best logging framework, but it is the only one which at
least doesn't create classpath conflicts.
review and discuss logging
--
Key: DELTASPIKE-59
URL
Message -
From: Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbax...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
T he only reason why I -1 typesafe logging is because I don't think we
really need it for internal development
: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
Also,
On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:25, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
1) -1 for i18n logging (i think we agree on it already)
I know our product managers are after i8ln for log messages - at least
INFO
(IIRC) and above should be l10n'd. I'll try to share the why when
: Friday, January 27, 2012 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
T he only reason why I -1 typesafe logging is because I don't think we
really need it for internal development. I don't think we should rule out
providing it as a feature - if that makes any sense. I think it adds
complexity that we
+1!
regards,
gerhard
2012/1/25 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
-1 to i18n and typesafe logging for version one.
Lincoln, why you hatin' on type-safe logging? Brother, hook me up with a
+1
:)
-Dan
Hehe, that's the nice thing here at Apache.
Since we only discuss those
full ack.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
1) -1 for i18n logging (i think we agree on it already)
2) +1
Also,
On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:25, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
1) -1 for i18n logging (i think we agree on it already)
I know our product managers are after i8ln for log messages - at least INFO
(IIRC) and above should be l10n'd. I'll try to share the why when I've chatted
to them.
So, I'm +0
a
technological perspective.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
Also,
On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:25, Gerhard Petracek wrote
Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Logging
Also,
On 25 Jan 2012, at 09:25, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
1) -1 for i18n logging (i think we agree on it already)
I
review and discuss logging
--
Key: DELTASPIKE-59
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-59
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 0.1
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 18:25, Lincoln Baxter, III
lincolnbax...@gmail.comwrote:
Funny, I've been meaning to mention this exact implementation but haven't
had the time. Looks like you beat me to it! You designed it so it's
probably better that way ;)
However, I think I'd like to support the
Message -
From: Ken Finnigan k...@kenfinnigan.me
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:22 AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Logging
All,
As we approach a 0.1 release of DeltaSpike, congratulations to everyone on
the good work so far, I feel it's a good time
!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Ken Finnigan k...@kenfinnigan.me
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:22 AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Logging
All,
As we approach a 0.1 release of DeltaSpike, congratulations
13 matches
Mail list logo
