Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-19 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
: Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow. - we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement). regards, gerhard 2012

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow. - we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement). regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com I honestly don't have a preference for the names. +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase On

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-18 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle if there are no objections, i'll import

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-18 Thread Jason Porter
: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle if there are no objections, i'll import the annotations tomorrow. - we can change the names later on (as soon as we have an agreement). regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com I honestly don't have

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 for: @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase @BeforeFacesRequest / @AfterFacesRequest @JsfPhaseListener regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi @ all, the support of cdi-observers for jsf phase-events in codi and seam-faces is very similar. a central difference

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 looks really good! LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: deltaspike deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle +1

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi pete, @View is just an interceptor which is often used in combination with the phase-listener observer-methods. i just mentioned it since it's documented side-by-side in the wiki, however, as mentioned before we have to postpone the discussion about it. regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Pete

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Pete Muir
@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:14 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle +1 for: @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase @BeforeFacesRequest / @AfterFacesRequest @JsfPhaseListener regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
: Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle +1 for: @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase @BeforeFacesRequest / @AfterFacesRequest @JsfPhaseListener regards, gerhard 2012/10/17 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi @ all, the support of cdi-observers for jsf

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 For Faces prefix istead of Jsf

Re: [DISCUSS] features related to the jsf lifecycle

2012-10-17 Thread Jason Porter
I honestly don't have a preference for the names. +1 for @BeforePhase / @AfterPhase On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Leathem bleat...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed 17 Oct 2012 11:17:46 AM PDT, Brian Leathem wrote: can we not build on the @ListenerFor annotation in JSF [1]?