yes, I means the vote of ee7.
I just get the post on jboss.org,
http://planet.jboss.org/post/ee7_is_approved.
Mark Little explained the vote result. When I saw the result, I had
thought weather there were some conflict between RedHat and Oracle, now
it seems my mistake.
Hantsy
On 5/1/2013
On May 2, 2013, at 7:35 AM, hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn wrote:
yes, I means the vote of ee7.
I just get the post on jboss.org,
http://planet.jboss.org/post/ee7_is_approved.
Mark Little explained the vote result. When I saw the result, I had
thought weather there were some conflict
Hi,
I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
still do not support CDI @Inject. Personally it is a big
disappointment. And other two big features introduced in JSF2.2,
resource contract and
hi hantsy,
see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as well).
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 hantsy han...@yahoo.com.cn
Hi,
I noticed Java EE 7 got approval, is there any plan to support Java EE 7.
And for JSF 2.2, the Converter, Validator , UIComponent, all listeners
That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
vote.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi hantsy,
see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344 (and the vote you mentioned is fine as well).
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 hantsy
yes - for ee7 (the vote for jsf 2.2 is fine).
regards,
gerhard
2013/5/1 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified time of the
vote.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi hantsy,
Ouch. Mistakes happen but that is a bit embarrasing...
Sent from my Nokia phone
-Original Message-
From: Jason Porter
Sent: 01.05.2013, 18:08
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7
That means the rep for Red Hat didn't vote in the specified
