Apache commons has commons-mail...and Seam 3 Mail including its template
rendering, Seam 3 includes another renderer module , but not released yet.
So I think if possible to complete the things are not included in Seam 3 .
1. complete another Render module for template rendering.
2. Is there
I hope there are some properties to mange the FlashMode, LockMode,
Transaction isolate level etc.
Hantsy
On 2/22/2013 07:18, Jason Porter (JIRA) wrote:
[
hmm doesn't this info get erased anyway?
This used to work fine in all other containers.
I'm fine with changing this if it still works with all the other containers.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Marek Schmidt (JIRA) j...@apache.org
To:
From: Radu Creanga rdc...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-293) Improve the
ViewScopedContext by observing ServletContext and HttpSession lifecycle
events
!
LieGrue,
strub
From: Radu Creanga rdc...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-293) Improve the
ViewScopedContext by observing ServletContext and HttpSession
hi radu,
as mentioned before:
once we have at least something similar to the window-handling of codi,
it's just about some lines of code
we just have to agree on #2 or #3 before we can start with it.
regards,
gerhard
2012/11/21 Radu Creanga rdc...@gmail.com
Hello everyone,
Gerhard,
From: Radu Creanga rdc...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-293) Improve the
ViewScopedContext by observing ServletContext and HttpSession lifecycle
ideas!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-293) Improve the ViewScopedContext
by observing
Hi Radu!
Yes, we already discussed this and agreed to import it.
Txs 4 your report!
LieGrue,
strub
From: Radu Creanga rdc...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created
@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-293) Improve the
ViewScopedContext by observing ServletContext and HttpSession lifecycle
events.
Hello everyone,
It seems this will require ServletContext events and Session events to
be published
Hello everyone,
It seems this will require ServletContext events and Session events to
be published to the CDI event bus, which in turn requires adding the
appropriate listeners to web.xml until CDI 1.1. I know Seam Solder has
these listeners implemented. Are there plans to import it into
Thanks a lot Rudy!
Do you also know anything about the following WLS related issues?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-241
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-261
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Rudy De Busscher (JIRA) j...@apache.org
To:
Hi Mark,
Working on them when I have time.
Since this is not much lately, It will take some more time I'm afraid
before they get fixed.
but eventually
Rudy
On 24 October 2012 10:22, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Thanks a lot Rudy!
Do you also know anything about the
@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2012 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-161) veto internal beans
annotated with @Typed()
yes - we are using @Typed() (empty) only for internal util- and
helper-classes which shouldn't be beans - but if we don't veto such
classes, it doesn't make
I don't get that issue.
Yes, we should not use @Exclude() instead of @Typed internally.
But no, we MUST NOT veto() beans which are @Typed()!
@Typed() beans can still be used for @New!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek (JIRA) j...@apache.org
To:
-
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-161) veto internal beans annotated
with @Typed()
hi,
right now we only use @Typed() for util, helper
I'm going to resurrect this thread, see if we can come to a consensus on
what we want to use for documentation.
As I currently understand things there are a few options on the table for
documentation of DeltaSpike:
* Apache CMS -- AIUI, this is a perl script that runs some extra stuff.
More info
@ our apache-cms experts:
it would be nice if you share your experience at the previous thread (see
[1]).
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://s.apache.org/QIe
2012/5/4 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
I'm going to resurrect this thread, see if we can come to a consensus on
what we want to use
packages?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit
visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint
-
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
On 25 Mar
@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit
visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
On 25 Mar 2012, at 17:30, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hi pete,
that would
, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit
visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
On 25 Mar 2012, at 17:30, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hi pete,
that would be possible e.g
Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit
visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility
of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
On 25 Mar 2012, at 17:30
@incubator.apache.org; gudnabr...@gmail.com
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
It could, I sort of envisioned that's what Core
ourselfs too much.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; gudnabr...@gmail.com
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility
?
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gerhard Petracek (Created) (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
Date: 25 March 2012 16:39:27 GMT+01:00
To: deltaspike-dev
Is this useful for Extension implementers? If so we might think about putting
them into spi packages?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira
? If so we might think about
putting them into spi packages?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility
, March 25, 2012 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-129) re-visit visibility of
AnnotationBuilder, ImmutableInjectionPoint, InjectableMethod and
ParameterValueRedefiner
On 25 Mar 2012, at 17:30, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hi pete,
that would be possible e.g
: Adam Warskiad...@softwaremill.pl
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-61) global alternatives
Wasn't global alternative enablement a feature planned for CDI 1.1?
And, besides, that's how it works in Weld
To:
deltaspike-dev@incubator.**apache.orgdeltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-61) global alternatives
Wasn't global alternative enablement a feature planned for CDI 1.1?
And, besides, that's how it works
I personally like the binding approach a little better. It seems to be more
similar to the CDI way of doing interceptors (which, at the end of the day
is essentially what we're doing). However, we have seen a need of doing
@Admin || @User or @Admin @User. The and is fairly easy, but the or is
hi adam,
see http://s.apache.org/TFf
regards,
gerhard
2012/1/26 Adam Warski ad...@softwaremill.pl
Wasn't global alternative enablement a feature planned for CDI 1.1?
And, besides, that's how it works in Weld currently anyway as far as I
know ;)
Adam
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:00 PM,
- Original Message -
From: Adam Warski ad...@softwaremill.pl
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-61) global alternatives
Wasn't global alternative enablement a feature planned for CDI 1.1
,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-61) global alternatives
Sent it to Jozef as an idea to do
Do you have a link to where this is in OWB? example maybe?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Gerhard,
Apologies for jumping the gun. didn't read right and thought this was the
discuss.
John
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi john,
thx for the question. i added the link to the jira issue.
i'll start a thread about it (similar
Just a follow up, there is at least one well known Java Project using
Sphinx for documentation: Selenium, also Spock is using it, though they're
not building their docs as part of a CI job. A large list of projects using
Sphinx is also available at [1].
The Selenium pom [2] uses antrun to call
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:20, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.comwrote:
i said: if there are too many open questions right now,...
Understood.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
to be good, then we can just push
this branch to ds.asf:master
wdyt?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-13
: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-13) Choose documentation
format and tools
hi dan,
i said: if there are too many open questions right now,...
we already discussed that we would use as few docbook-tags as possible
(in
any case).
however
Btw, I do *strongly* recommend using awestruct for creating the website. In
10+ years of creating websites (and applications) I've never encountered
anything remotely as productive...esp when all you want to do is create web
pages with information.
-Dan
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 18:25, Dan Allen
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:32, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dan, I also like the results Andrew and Aslak had with that for the new
Arquillian page.
...that was mostly done by me, Aslak and Sarah :)
I think we are talking about two different things. For Arquillian, we have
used
There's this: https://github.com/tomdz/sphinx-maven
If not, I'm sure we can write our own. If we with Sphinx then the question is
CPython or Jython for running it. It also looks like there's an ant task wen
you go the Jython route.
Markdown would be fine, but what would you use to create
Shane's probably tired of hearing me harp on docbook, oh well :)
Here's a tool that's nice to use, output is good and it has a great
community following: http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ If we want to look into it,
great, if we go back to docbook, great, I'll stop complaining and just use
it.
Buildable
sbryzak
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
short addition:
@all initial committers:
please send your jira-username.
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/12 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
hi @ all,
i've created a jira project [1] for
For Seam 3, and actually all JBoss projects on GitHub, we've added a Git
Pull Request sent step which the next step is Pull Request Closed or
Rejected. Closed will move to Resolved. Rejected moves it back to open.
It's something that everyone can add so community people can say they've
sent a pull
49 matches
Mail list logo
