To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
John,
The specification has the notion of a class being a managed bean, as
laid out in
chapter 3 of the spec.
Using @Unmanaged would complement
+1 @veto
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici
marius.bogoev...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggested @Unmanaged (or even @NotManaged, or anything that refers to
class as a managed bean in the spirit of 3.1.1).
the easiest way in this case is a formal vote about @Veto vs @Exclude vs
@Unmanaged/@NotManaged
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/30 Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:55, Marius Bogoevici
marius.bogoev...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggested @Unmanaged (or even @NotManaged, or
-
From: Marius Bogoevici marius.bogoev...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
John,
The specification has the notion of a class being a managed bean, as laid out
in
chapter 3
of a
DeltaSpike migration.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Marius Bogoevici marius.bogoev...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
John,
The specification has
/api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Veto.java
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
it looks like @Exclude
/479e144ccfa0235faf5662355d02a7fe5f6725f6/api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Veto.java
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
about @Exclude?
Cheers,
Arne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned
: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a
technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of
the
mechanism behind.
if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about the
other
21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a
technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware
of
the
mechanism behind
?
Cheers,
Arne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned
: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the
mechanism behind.
if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about the other
alternatives: +1 for @Skip
[mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who
Veto is rationally the most appropriate since it directly translates to
calling ProcessAnnotatedType#veto()
However, I'd like to offer one other alternative:
@Skip
While veto describes what the extension is doing internally, skip is how
the developer perceives the result of the action. The
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the
mechanism behind.
if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about the other
alternatives: +1 for @Skip
regards,
gerhard
What about @Exclude?
Cheers,
Arne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the
mechanism behind
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the
mechanism behind.
if we are talking only about @Veto vs
As per [1] we're discussing the top features from both CODI (core) and
Solder.
This issue is for @Veto [2] from Solder.
Basic idea:
Provide an easy way for application developers to veto beans in their
application. Of course users could create their own Extension and veto that
way, this does all
Sorry the correct abstract class is
https://github.com/seam/solder/blob/develop/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/solder/beanManager/BeanManagerAware.javaYou'll
have to follow the code around to get all of what it does.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:05, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com wrote:
As per
Bah, wrong thread sorry, disregard.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:28, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry the correct abstract class is
https://github.com/seam/solder/blob/develop/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/solder/beanManager/BeanManagerAware.javaYou'll
have to follow the code
:
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:05 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
As per [1] we're discussing the top features from both CODI (core)
and
Solder.
This issue is for @Veto [2] from Solder.
Basic idea:
Provide an easy way for application
, 2011 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
we discussed such a feature for codi and didn't add it because of
@Typed()
@jason:
imo @Veto is the wrong name (if there is no real veto)
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/14 Jason Porterlightguard...@gmail.com
Sort of, it doesn't really
23 matches
Mail list logo
