Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASF Repository:
About this time what I'm maintaining is the following two repository
directories:
Thanks for this write-up.
I haven't yet explored the idea of getting a repository.apache.org
virtual host going. Up to this
- Original Message -
From: Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: ASF Repository, closer.cgi and Depot
Sorry for the cross post but this seems relevant to both these groups.
I was thinking about the
Markus:
Would you be willing to take the DownloadManager development on? I think
the
'sharing' we'd get discussing it, and how to implement it, would be
education for this team as a whole. I think we'd work out more details
with
doing it this way.
?
regards
Adam
Erik Abele wrote:
I suspect their views would include what you suggest, that
distribution might
save some nomimal (c.f. artifact sizes) bandwidth savings give some
CPU
saving, but it'd be at significant loss of 'control' (of well behaved
clients). Central control over this seems the most
like I said already, I am browsing through the API and adding JavaDoc to
some classes. Right now I have a problem concerning the UpdaterConfig.
This class is called all over the API and should provide basic
configuration for the application. But right now, I am pretty unsure,
how this
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
like I said already, I am browsing through the API and adding JavaDoc to
some classes. Right now I have a problem concerning the UpdaterConfig.
This class is called all over the API and should provide basic
configuration for the application. But right now, I am pretty
+1 for removal of everything unused and not needed right now. after we
have cleared the API we could add this once again. there is still svn
which takes care about backups :-)
Nick Chalko wrote:
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
like I said already, I am browsing through the API and adding JavaDoc to
some
