Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-05 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Nakayama ÂÂÂ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ÂÂÂ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ÂÂÂ Naka ÂÂÂ http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html */ - Original Message - From: "Kathey Marsden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Sunday, April 03

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-05 Thread TomohitoNakayama
Naka http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html */ - Original Message - From: "Kathey Marsden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:12 PM Subject: Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134 Tom

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-03 Thread Kathey Marsden
TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > I was interested in issue of Derby-167... > > I recognized there was proposed three options. > 1:being able to "generate by default as identity" > 2:being able to disable the "identity" feature for a column > 3:being able to generate a column as non identity an

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-03 Thread TomohitoNakayama
TED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 12:39 AM Subject: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134 TomohitoNakayama wrote: Hello. Thank for all who advise and help me ! Now I'm reading code of derby here and there , and found this program

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-03 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Right... Option 1, adding GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY would be great. Satheesh Kathey Marsden wrote: Danesh Irani wrote: Hello Kathey, Christian when reporting Derby-167 had a few possible solutions, is Satheesh's proposed SQL Standard way included in one of those? If not

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-03 Thread Kathey Marsden
Danesh Irani wrote: >Hello Kathey, > >Christian when reporting Derby-167 had a few possible solutions, is >Satheesh's proposed SQL Standard way included in one of those? If not >could you perhaps elaborate a little on what Satheesh proposed. >Personally I think all 3 of Christians solutions would

Re: (Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-02 Thread Danesh Irani
Hello Kathey, Christian when reporting Derby-167 had a few possible solutions, is Satheesh's proposed SQL Standard way included in one of those? If not could you perhaps elaborate a little on what Satheesh proposed. Personally I think all 3 of Christians solutions would add value in terms of flexi

(Derby 167) was Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-02 Thread Kathey Marsden
TomohitoNakayama wrote: > Hello. > > Thank for all who advise and help me ! > > Now I'm reading code of derby here and there , and found this program > is very attractive. > I want to find next material for hacking :D > Hello Tomohito, Since you are looking for a next project , I wanted to put

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-02 Thread TomohitoNakayama
--- Original Message - From: "Satheesh Bandaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:43 AM Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134 I will work on committing this patch. Since you are working on an improvemen

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-04-02 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
Naka > http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html > > */ > - Original Message - From: "Satheesh Bandaram" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Derby Development" > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:43 AM > Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: Ab

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-30 Thread TomohitoNakayama
*/ - Original Message - From: "Satheesh Bandaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 3:43 AM Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134 I will work on committing this patch. Since you are working on an improvement, woul

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-29 Thread Satheesh Bandaram
TECTED] > > Naka > http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html > > */ > - Original Message - From: "Jack Klebanoff" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Derby Development" > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:31 AM > Subject: Re: [Patch

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-29 Thread Mamta Satoor
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:44:30 +0900, TomohitoNakayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Waiting 1 day and no error was found. > Can I ask committers to commit this patch ? > > Or I should commit it by myself ? Hi Tomohito, Great job with being so persistent with this bug. As for commiting the patch,

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-29 Thread TomohitoNakayama
Message - From: "Jack Klebanoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:31 AM Subject: Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134 TomohitoNakayama wrote: Hello. I have added some test to orderby.sql (and correspond result to

Re: [Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-28 Thread Jack Klebanoff
TomohitoNakayama wrote: Hello. I have added some test to orderby.sql (and correspond result to orderby.out) , which was suggested by Jack Klebanoff. And I have executed derbylang test and coulud not found error exept for lang/floattypes.sql. I think this error is not caused by my patch. derbyla

[Patch] Re: About improvement of DERBY-134

2005-03-27 Thread TomohitoNakayama
Hello. I have added some test to orderby.sql (and correspond result to orderby.out) , which was suggested by Jack Klebanoff. And I have executed derbylang test and coulud not found error exept for lang/floattypes.sql. I think this error is not caused by my patch. derbylang_report.txt is attache