[RESULT] [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-18 Thread Rick Hillegas
Thanks for everyone's work on coding, documenting, and testing 10.6.1.0. The polls have closed. The community has approved 10.6.1.0 as an official Derby release: +1: Rick Hillegas (pmc) Mamta Satoor (pmc) Bryan Pendleton (pmc) Lily Wei Tiago Espinha Dag Wanvik (pmc) Knut Anders Hatlen (pmc) Kr

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-16 Thread Mike Matrigali
Did some stress testing, ran full set of tests against windows xp, and did buddy testing. Release looks good to me. +1 Rick Hillegas wrote: Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http://people.apache.org/~rhilleg

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-14 Thread Myrna van Lunteren
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it > as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.6.1.0/ > > The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, May 17. >

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-14 Thread Kim Haase
+1 from the docs perspective. Kim On 04/26/10 05:16 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote: Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.6.1.0/ The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-14 Thread Kristian Waagan
On 26.04.10 23:16, Rick Hillegas wrote: Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. [ snip ] +1 from me. I have tested the RC by running the regression tests on various platforms. I also ran an industry standard benchmark (SPEC jAppServer

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-14 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
On 04/26/10 11:16 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept > it as a Derby release. > The release candidate seems to be in very good shape. +1 from me. -- Knut Anders

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-13 Thread Kathey Marsden
On 5/13/2010 2:12 PM, Tiago Espinha wrote: +1 provided that Kathey's "Just heads up, possible protocol error issue on 10.6" is just a false alarm. Definitely a false alarm. See DERBY-4655

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-13 Thread Dag H. Wanvik
Rick Hillegas writes: > +1 > > This release contains many useful improvements and I am not aware of > any new regressions reported against this distribution. +1 Dag

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-13 Thread Tiago Espinha
sage From: Rick Hillegas To: "derby-dev@db.apache.org" Sent: Mon, 26 April, 2010 22:16:35 Subject: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.6.1.

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-13 Thread Lily Wei
the database better and better day in and day out. Lily From: Bryan Pendleton To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 12, 2010 11:42:41 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > Please test-drive the 10

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-12 Thread Bryan Pendleton
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it +1 This release looks quite good. Thanks to all for the hard work! bryan

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-12 Thread Mamta Satoor
The mail got sent before I was done. The jira entry for the XPLAIN issue is DERBY-4645. thanks, Mamta On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Mamta Satoor wrote: > +1 > > I did AIX platform, SHOW FUNCTIONS, XPLAIN functionality and adhoc > testing and reported one issue with XPLAIN feature > > On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-12 Thread Mamta Satoor
+1 I did AIX platform, SHOW FUNCTIONS, XPLAIN functionality and adhoc testing and reported one issue with XPLAIN feature On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote: > +1 > > This release contains many useful improvements and I am not aware of any new > regressions reported against this

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-05-12 Thread Rick Hillegas
+1 This release contains many useful improvements and I am not aware of any new regressions reported against this distribution. Regards, -Rick Rick Hillegas wrote: Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http:/

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-04-27 Thread Rick Hillegas
Kim Haase wrote: I looked at db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.tar.gz and db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.zip. The docs appear to be fine except that they don't include Knut's very last checkin for DERBY-4401 yesterday (cosmetic fix to the syntax of INNER JOIN in the Ref Man). This is obviously not worth a respin i

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-04-27 Thread Knut Anders Hatlen
On 04/27/10 16:17, Kim Haase wrote: > I looked at db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.tar.gz and db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.zip. > The docs appear to be fine except that they don't include Knut's very > last checkin for DERBY-4401 yesterday (cosmetic fix to the syntax of > INNER JOIN in the Ref Man). This is obvio

Re: [VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-04-27 Thread Kim Haase
I looked at db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.tar.gz and db-derby-10.6.1.0-bin.zip. The docs appear to be fine except that they don't include Knut's very last checkin for DERBY-4401 yesterday (cosmetic fix to the syntax of INNER JOIN in the Ref Man). This is obviously not worth a respin in itself, but if t

[VOTE] 10.6.1.0 release

2010-04-26 Thread Rick Hillegas
Please test-drive the 10.6.1.0 candidate, then vote on whether to accept it as a Derby release. The candidate lives at: http://people.apache.org/~rhillegas/10.6.1.0/ The polls close at 5:00 pm San Francisco time on Monday, May 17. 10.6.1.0 is a feature release, described in greater detail here