[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12377482 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Committed derby-1253.v1.diff at subversion revision 399072. I made the
following changes to the patch:
1) Commented out the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0 spec? In my
latest copy of the spec and java
This is required.
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376584 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Lance has clarified that this is documented in the Compliance chapter and in
the javadoc.
Verify that we don't raise