Re: Connection string log messages

2005-07-13 Thread Craig Russell
Hi David,I don't need to use the term; I can just call it a "Connection".   This doesn't really impact the resulting code, just what we put into the comments and the JIRA bug.I understand. Perhaps it would be more useful to avoid "physical" and use either Embedded or Network, as in "Network Connect

Re: Connection string log messages

2005-07-13 Thread David Van Couvering
I don't need to use the term; I can just call it a "Connection". This doesn't really impact the resulting code, just what we put into the comments and the JIRA bug. BTW, if you want to get picky, nothing is "physical" -- from the perspective of quantum physics, it's all a mass of probability

Re: Connection string log messages

2005-07-13 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Craig Russell wrote: > Hi David, > > My only issue is with the term "Physical Connection". > > Connections are logical, not physical. Ethernet cables, adapters, wires, > RAM, disk drives are physical. Ports, sockets, connections, database > tables and columns are logical. > > I really don't lik

Connection string log messages

2005-07-13 Thread Craig Russell
Hi David,My only issue is with the term "Physical Connection".Connections are logical, not physical. Ethernet cables, adapters, wires, RAM, disk drives are physical. Ports, sockets, connections, database tables and columns are logical.I really don't like using physical to describe the lowest level