Hi Christoph,
Am 12.06.2015 um 23:42 schrieb Christoph Noack:
Hi Klaus-Jürgen, hi all!
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 23:07 +0200 schrieb K-J LibreOffice:
Hi Christoph,
Am 08.06.2015 um 23:58 schrieb Christoph Noack:
Hi all,
Nice to see you're back.
Have I been away?
Our Sleeping Beauty. ;
Hi Klaus-Jürgen, hi all!
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 23:07 +0200 schrieb K-J LibreOffice:
> Hi Christoph,
> Am 08.06.2015 um 23:58 schrieb Christoph Noack:
> > Hi all,
>
> Nice to see you're back.
Have I been away?
Just kidding. Thanks for the kind words ... I recently started (and
still am)
Hi Sophie,
On 06/10/2015 05:02 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Jay,
Le 10/06/2015 14:20, Jay Philips a écrit :
Hi Sophie,
So editing the data in the database makes it suitable for 'Bibliography
Database' to be under Tools but editing the link to the database
shouldnt be considered suitable for it to be u
Le 10/06/2015 14:40, Cor Nouws a écrit :
> So the challenge - where the issues are about - is to make working with
> Styles more natural, visible.
Hi all,
[Summary: style should be promoted by better answering user needs
(several -new?- features proposed), not (only) by changing the ui]
Here
Great reply. Thank you for the elaborate information.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Christophe Strobbe <
stro...@hdm-stuttgart.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/2015 13:41, Pedro Rosmaninho wrote:
> > I guess it is controversial because there's a hostility of some LO users
> to
> > allow direct f
Hi,
On 10/06/2015 13:41, Pedro Rosmaninho wrote:
> I guess it is controversial because there's a hostility of some LO users to
> allow direct formatting of the document instead of resorting to Styles.
> Therefore, some people consider that direct formatting should be hidden?
It is also an accessi
Hi Christoph,
Am 08.06.2015 um 23:58 schrieb Christoph Noack:
Hi all,
Nice to see you're back.
I hope you don't if I also add some thoughts...
Your thoughts are worth enough to listen to.
Maybe you should tell the new guys who you are.
--
Grüße
k-j
Member of TheDocumentFoundation
http://
Pedro Rosmaninho wrote on 10-06-15 15:35:
> I see your point, but there are other types of users for LO. And
> sabotaging their way of working in benefit of others isn't the best way to
> accomplish it.
Of course. That is not the goal. Sorry if that was not clear from my
writing.
Ciao,
Cor
--
>
>
> From a trainer and migration consultant perspective, I see the mess and
> grief and productivity loss, along with interoperability issues caused
> by direct formatting.
I see your point, but there are other types of users for LO. And
sabotaging their way of working in benefit of others isn
Hi Jay,
Le 10/06/2015 14:20, Jay Philips a écrit :
> Hi Sophie,
>
> On 06/08/2015 12:02 PM, Sophie wrote:
>> Hi Jay,
>> Le 07/06/2015 19:07, Jay Philips a écrit :
>> [...]
>>
>>> Would 'Exchange Database' be more suitable in the Tools menu next to
>>> 'Bibliography Database'?
>>
>> Why, you're not
Hi Pedro,
Pedro Rosmaninho wrote on 10-06-15 13:41:
> I guess it is controversial because there's a hostility of some LO users to
> allow direct formatting of the document instead of resorting to Styles.
> Therefore, some people consider that direct formatting should be hidden?
>
> However, many
Hi Sophie,
On 06/08/2015 12:02 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Jay,
Le 07/06/2015 19:07, Jay Philips a écrit :
[...]
Would 'Exchange Database' be more suitable in the Tools menu next to
'Bibliography Database'?
Why, you're not working on the database, but editing the link to the
database.
So editing
I guess it is controversial because there's a hostility of some LO users to
allow direct formatting of the document instead of resorting to Styles.
Therefore, some people consider that direct formatting should be hidden?
However, many users do prefer to use direct formatting and competing Office
s
Hi Sophie,
On 06/07/2015 11:22 PM, Sophie wrote:
The promise, at the time, was to re-start the survey to obtain more
accurate statistics (I cannot remember the discussion word by word as
too much time and too many things have gone by). I suppose that some
objections coming from Sophie reflect th
Hi all,
I hope you don't if I also add some thoughts...
Am Montag, den 08.06.2015, 04:38 +0400 schrieb Jay Philips:
> On 06/07/2015 10:06 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> > Hi Jay, I suppose you are not aware of the internal discussions based on
> > those statistics, which were rejected by a large perc
Hi Jay,
Le 07/06/2015 19:07, Jay Philips a écrit :
[...]
>
>> * 'Exchange database' doesn't it belongs to bibliography?
>> --> no please, do not hide this function that is used a lot doing mail
>> merge
>
> Would 'Exchange Database' be more suitable in the Tools menu next to
> 'Bibliography Data
On 06/07/2015 10:06 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Hi Jay, I suppose you are not aware of the internal discussions based on
those statistics, which were rejected by a large percentage of the
community, to the point that there was a petition to stop the "so
called" Renaissance Project.
Hi Italo,
Yes
Hi all,
Le 07/06/2015 20:06, Italo Vignoli a écrit :
> On 07/06/15 19:07, Jay Philips wrote:
>
>> The software hasnt changed that dramatically since the OOo stats were
>> collected and user behaviour doesnt change that much over time as well.
>> I dont exclusively rely on the stats, as i do compar
On 07/06/15 19:07, Jay Philips wrote:
> The software hasnt changed that dramatically since the OOo stats were
> collected and user behaviour doesnt change that much over time as well.
> I dont exclusively rely on the stats, as i do compare LO with its
> various competitors (MSO, iWork, WPS, WordPe
On 06/04/2015 05:22 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Sophi, just saw this message now. :D
Some comments on the details provided on the issue, don't take them as
criticism but as a long time trainer, here is my feedback with my user
experience on background.
Your feedback is always valued. :D
20 matches
Mail list logo
