On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
> On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> > We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup,
> > also attached in .ods format. This shows payment processing fees,
> > two successive months of carry-over, a
On 08/03/2016 01:31 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
>> On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>> We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup,
>>> also attached in .ods format. This shows payment processing
On 03.08.2016 10:31, Bryan Richter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
>> On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>> We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup,
>>> also attached in .ods format. This shows payment processing f
On 03.08.2016 12:52, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/03/2016 01:31 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
>>> On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup,
also attached
On 08/03/2016 04:24 AM, mray wrote:
>
>
> On 03.08.2016 12:52, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 08/03/2016 01:31 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 01:55:44AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> We discussed this in today's meeting
On August 3, 2016 5:54:28 PM GMT+03:00, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm just saying that post-MVP we want to make sure history
> emphasizes pride in being a long-term patron. The strict MVP could have
> no history. The nice-for-MVP history is just the minimum you describe
> that allows auditing ("
