On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Michael Siepmann
wrote:
On 12/01/2016 07:52 AM, mray wrote:
On 30.11.2016 07:30, Aaron Wolf wrote:
tentative 4a. "Our innovative platform empowers you to join with
others
to fund the public goods /you/ care about."
tentative 4b.
On 12/01/2016 07:52 AM, mray wrote:
> On 30.11.2016 07:30, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> tentative 4a. "Our innovative platform empowers you to join with others
>> to fund the public goods /you/ care about."
>>
>> tentative 4b. "At Snowdrift.coop, you collaborate with others to build
>> greater support
On 30.11.2016 07:30, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> tentative 4a. "Our innovative platform empowers you to join with others
> to fund the public goods /you/ care about."
>
> tentative 4b. "At Snowdrift.coop, you collaborate with others to build
> greater support for public goods."
>
> I'm not happy with
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Michael Siepmann
wrote:
I'm thinking that in this super-short intro, it would be better to
omit
any reference to a snowdrift. It's just too confusing, not necessary
enough, and doesn't help to engage people right away. People can
I really like this script and I also think that this works better for the short
version. Well done Michael!
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Snowdrift-design] Intro video script
Local Time: November 26, 2016 5:11 AM
UTC Time: November 26, 2016 4:11 AM
From: m
On 26.11.2016 05:11, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
> On 11/25/2016 10:17 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>
With the updated first line:
SCRIPT2C/
The snowdrift dilemma: Regardless of who clears the snow, we all
benefit. So, who will do the work?
This public goods
On 11/24/2016 01:52 AM, mray wrote:
>
> Thank you Aaron!
> I like the script.
>
>
>> The snowdrift dilemma asks: who will clear the public road when we all
>> get the results whether or not we help?
>
> * "get the results" sounds very neutral. "benefit from it" would a
> positive connotation