Public bug reported:
The effect of this bug is quite similar to the one the was reported via
bug 1133663 ”Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty
folders”. Directions to reproduce follow:
1. Create a tar.bz2 archive of a directory containing a fragmented file. One
such file
Public bug reported:
The Login screen will be displayed and the screen will never go blank
under any of the following conditions:
1. Following a cold (power on) boot.
2. Following a warm (restart) boot.
3. Following detection of mouse movement or keyboard input when the screen was
locked.
This
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1196063 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196063
??? Could not find related bug 1196063. Was the bug number mistyped?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
Another data point.
In addition to failing via the right click extract here menu, the CLI
file-roller -h command produces the same failure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
Please re-open this bug. I tested using a recent 13.10 and file-roller
3.9.90 and observed that extract here fails to delay directory restore
causing EVERY non-empty extracted folder to assume the date/time of
extraction.
I will attempt to attach a screenshot of the relevant portion of the
GNOME
** Attachment added: file-roller 3.9.90.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801754/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in
** Attachment added: file-roller 3.8.4 changes.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801755/+files/file-roller%203.8.4%20changes.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
This BUG still exists in file-roller 3.8.3 (13.10 dev)
The bug report submitted to GNOME several months ago indicates NO activity
which would lead one to believe that it is being ignored. Might there be a
Ubuntu-centric workaround?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Jeremy,
Thanks for the update.
I have been using gksu nautilus to change ownership of each newly
formatted ext4 partition and/or root-owned files that I need to rename,
modify or delete from time to time. One such use is with fstab. I
prefer to rename it and modify a copy. When happy with the
This BUG manifests in 12.10, 13.04 and 13.10 but NOT in 12.04
Apparently this functionality is either considered perfect and/or not
important enough to warrant QA regression testing.
When a non-empty directory gets extracted, its datetime stamp is
immediately restored but recursive extraction of
Sebastian,
Bug 697756 was filed a couple of weeks ago but has not been
acknowledged.
Perhaps 100% reproducible bugs offer little technical challenge and are
therefore ignored.
** Attachment added: Bug 697756 - file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore
failing during non-empty folder
Link to upstream bug report follows:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697756
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #697756
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697756
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty
folder extraction
64-bit File-Roller 3.6.0 via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9
19:31:23 UTC 2012 fails
64-bit File-Roller 3.6.3 via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1
19:52:57 UTC
Public bug reported:
Unity locks EVERY partition to the launcher at startup - UGLY useless
CLUTTER
64-bit unity via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC
2012 fails
64-bit unity via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC
2013 fails
64-bit unity via
Public bug reported:
Gparted locks EVERY partition to the launcher when launched - UGLY
useless CLUTTER
64-bit gparted via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC
2012 fails
64-bit gparted via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC
2013 fails
64-bit
Public bug reported:
64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-15-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 27 19:19:30 UTC
2013
1. Attempted to install Chrome Stable but got a dependency error message
concerning libudev0
2. Attempted to install libudev0 via apt-get isntall libudev0 and got a message
indicating that it
Public bug reported:
D07-1304 3.8.0-15-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 27 19:19:30 UTC 2013
1. Atempt to install upgrades.
2. Hang trying to install 3.8.0-16 following an install of the 2013-04_01 daily
build.
Had the same symptoms trying to upgrade from 3.8.0-14 to 3.8.0-15
IN both cases, the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002
b
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Apport retracing service
1152...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002
Thank you for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Ernest Boyd ernestb...@gmail.com wrote
Bug 1044002 appears to be a private bug and is therefore NOT accessible.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Apport retracing service
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1044002
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062733
Title:
evince crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications about
Public bug reported:
64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC
2013
Open a PDF.
Prepare to search for text by pressing Control F
CRASH!
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: evince 3.6.1-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic
Apparently, the PDF that I used causes the failure in 13.04 but not 12.04
I will attach the PDF associated with the failure.
** Attachment added: PDF Associated with Evince crash
Great Idea Sebastian
This bug is 100% reproducible.
However, my attempt at filing a report via Bugzilla was more difficult than
being confronted by the US tax code for the first time.
Perhaps someone with knowledge if the secret ritual would be so kind as to
report this.
Thanks.
--
You
This functionally WORKED in 12.04, got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not
been fixed in either 64-bit 3.5.0-25-generic #39~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Tue
Feb 26 00:07:14 UTC 2013 or 64-bit 3.8.0-7-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu
Feb 21 20:07:18 UTC 2013
Since I make use of this functionally frequently each day,
Public bug reported:
Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders.
This functionally WORKED in 12.04, got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not
been fixed in either 64-bit 3.5.0-25-generic #39~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Tue
Feb 26 00:07:14 UTC 2013 or 64-bit 3.8.0-7-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-6-generic.
Tested Friday 2013-02_16
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025
Title:
gksu nautllus
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-6-generic.
Tested Friday 2013-02_16
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic.
Tested Friday 2013-02_01
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025
Title:
gksu nautllus
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic.
Tested Friday 2013-02_01
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here
This functionally WORKED in 12.04 but got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not
been fixed in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic. Since I
make use of this functionally frequently each day, I have avoided 12.10
except to determine if certain bugs have been fixed.
I would appreciate it if
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 64-bit 13.04 3.8.0-2 generic
Alt-F2 to launch gksu nautilus with ROOT privilege.
Unable to change preferences due to MISSING file menu.
File menu does provide the preferences option when nautilus is launched
with USER privilege.
** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-2-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_27
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic.
Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
In my daily work archives are created to preserve snapshots of work in
progress. In addition, they are extracted and the before/after folder
structures are compared via Beyond Compare. IF Nvidia drivers would stop
randomly hanging and thus forcing power resets, I might be able to
reduce
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel
3.5.0-21-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to preserve
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue
to use 12.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716
Title:
Extract Here fails to
This bug STILL occurs in 1210 v19
This bug appears to be similar to bug 1076731 which does NOT appear in 1210 v19
but does occur in earlier versions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
MOST of the time the problem has been Nvidia driver related. The
following options should be ENABLED by default:
1. Mouse and Touchpad - Show position of pointer when the Control key is
pressed.
2. Keyboard Layout Options - Key sequence to kill the X server - Control + Alt
When an archive is decompressed, original folder/file date-time stamps should
be preserved.
Current behavior sets them to the date-time of extraction.
Perhaps this bug being ignored because it only effects serious users;
coupled with a strong perception that Ubuntu is only being used to
tar -xpf functions correctly with 64-bit 12.04 but not with 64-bit 12.10
(Different partitions but same hardware)
Have changes to the kernel broken it or are Unity changes the cause?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Extract Here functions correctly with 64-bit 12.04 but not with 64-bit 12.10
(Different partitions but same hardware)
Have changes to the kernel broken it or are Unity changes the cause?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Use Right-Click Extract Here command to untar a tar.bz2 archive.
Non-empty folders will lose original timestamps and show date/time of
extraction.
Empty folders and files are processed correctly and retain original timestamps.
** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Public bug reported:
Use tar -xpf untar a tar.bz2 archive.
Non-empty folders will lose original timestamps and show date/time of
extraction.
The exception will be the top folder which will have its original timestamp
retained.
Empty folders and files are processed correctly and retain original
Depressing the power button (only tried while logged in) or selecting
shutdown from the menu will produce a dialog which will default to
shutdown after a minute. Although this power down option works
correctly, 5 to 7 seven seconds seems like a long time while awaiting a
forced shutdown and a
My hardware is Intel-based (e8500). Traceroute works OK.
--
gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-nettool in ubuntu.
--
This is still and issue with 9.10 and 10.04 b2 (lucid-
desktop-i386_2010-04-12_0812). The screensaver should care about USER
inactivity while powersave should also be concerned with system
activity.
A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take
quite some time.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
1.VLC Inhibits Power Management even when the CHECKBOX, Inhibit the power
management daemon during playback, is unchecked.
2.A reboot is required to get power management to again function properly.
VLC 1.0.2-1ubuntu2.1
ProblemType: Bug
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402981/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402982/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402983/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu-910
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu
drivers.
Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with
hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was
associated with use of generic drivers.
Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10
Upgraded to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot desktop system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first
SATA drive.
Ubuntu 9.10 was installed via LiveCD with BIOS set to AHCI.
Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for power-down.
Push power button.
During power-up,
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699380/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699381/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699382/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu 9.10
After a reboot, the screensaver did activate.
However, the LCD display did not appear to fully turn off when it should have.
I expected it to enter the no-signal low power state where the power light
would turn amber.
It never reached this state although it did go blank.
In addition, 9.10 was
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive.
Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for a complete shutdown.
Push power button.
During power-up observe message concerning waking up.
Select 9.04 from the Grub
FYI - This should not matter, but the PC manifesting the failure is a
desktop.
--
Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551282/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551283/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551284/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu 9.10
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive.
NVIDIA 9500gt video card.
Screensaver fails to activate although test modes operate correctly.
Either Suspend and Hibenate can each be successfully executed via the
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553005/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553007/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553008/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
FYI Just reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae
GNOME 2.28.1
--
Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not
manifest in
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310366/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310367/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310371/ProcStatus.txt
--
Problems
After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the LiveCD, I cannot
access a second or third SATA drive. Symptoms seem identical to those
described above. Functionality that worked correctly in 8.10 and 9.04
got broken in 9.10.
--
Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
This failure can occur if Firefox has windows open, even if the user is
not directly interacting with any of them. One failure occurred while
interacting with Places, but it usually occurs during interaction with a
Firefox window. This failure has
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330414/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330415/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330416/ProcStatus.txt
--
Ubuntu 9.10
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-Beta, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA
drive
9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for
each and allows me to mount following authorization.
9.10-Beta incorrectly displays
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346084/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346085/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346086/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
BUG appears to have be fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (jaunty 9.04 beta).
Thanks
--
Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target
CD is FULL
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
66 matches
Mail list logo
