Unfortunately, in Ubuntu 8.10 this is still WY broken. (Ref: bug 316961)
Doing the same thing - trying out resolutions on a ViewSonic A75F
monitor, not only did I totally hoze my session - I hozed it in classic
style.
It took me several hours of hacking around with a recovery terminal
before
Changing from FIXED to INCOMPLETE (= not-fixed, re-opened?)
Added comment and reference to duplicate bug 316961 entered by me on 1/13/09
Jim
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
--
gnome-display-properties should revert change automatically if
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 197673 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197673
beN,
Up between the "System" section in my bug report, and "Steps to
Reproduce" I disclose the operating system - Ubuntu 8.10. ( ;-) )
pak33m,
You are most welcome. And you are right, I had no package lis
Sebastien,
I have decided to toss this into your in-basket for disposition.
(I'm not sure if I'm supposed to even DO this - apologies in advance if this is
a huge breach of protocol.)
1. This REALLY needs to be fixed.
2. I have no idea who the "responsible developer" would be at this
point in
A thousand humble apologies.
My original bug was marked as a duplicate of THIS bug - and THIS is not
a duplicate of anything else - so I felt it was reasonable to believe
that this bug was the "root" bug that all other duplicates should point
toward.
Especially since there was a post-fix comment
Ref: Bug 316961 (duplicate of this)
I experienced the exact same issue, and (not finding THIS bug), wrote it
up yet again.
Essentially my steps to reproduce involved selecting an invalid display
resolution and accepting it.
The result (as of 8.10) is a functionally "bricked" box. Even though I
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome
Issue:
When I open a file browser window - pointing to virtually anywhere - clicking
elsewhere, (i.e. a child window, inside the current window, the menu panel bar,
etc.), the title bar sometimes turns white (as if the window had lost focus),
and
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21579742/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21579743/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21579744/ProcStatus.txt
** Descrip
I suspect that this is the correct package, based on the log report
containing "libgnome-window-settings1 1:2.24.0.1-0ubuntu7.1" which I
believe to be relevant to this bug.
Note that this is pure, unmitigated guess-work. If you know better,
feel free to change.
Flame mail to /dev/null
Jim
** S
Luke,
I hate to break the bad news to you - but (at least in Intrepid), that's
NOT true.
I set my screen resolution/refresh rate to something higher than my
monitor could display - and I got a blank screen. I had to actually
*KILL POWER* to get the beast to reboot, and when I booted into recover
p.s. . . . .
I actually tried "xfix" several times in a row to see if that would
help. No cigar
--
Screennresolution applet no longer asks for confirmation of new resolution
settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279569
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
Issue:
If a particular monitor - with particular specifications and limitations
- is plugged into a Windows system, attempting to change the monitor
resolution is accompanied by a check-box that says "Hide resolutions
this monitor ca
All work described above was done at the "console" (direclty logged into
the machine - not from a remote session or Samba)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734552
Titl
Public bug reported:
Yesterday when moving relatively huge amounts of data between hard
drives on my system (using the GUI - drag-and-drop) I discovered that
after some time I had consumed all available memory and all available
swap.
System:
Athlon 64 X2 processor on ASUS A8R32-MVP Deluxe MoBo.
4
Folks, here is my dos centavos, dva kopekie, two cents, or whatever. . .
.
Note: Distro used is Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
1. Allowing physical icons to overlap is just plain messy and un-
professional.
Most of the places I have worked for had a bug-rating from 1-4, 1 being
"hotter-than-hell" and 4 bei
** Also affects: linux
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: leak memory
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734552
Title:
Memory leak in Nautilus
Ref: question #148866 in Launchpad.
I have taken the (admittedly great) liberty of inviting the Kernel team
to weigh-in on this since I am beginning to suspect that this may
actually be a kernel issue.
Summary:
When moving huge files - hundred+gig to terabyte sized file groups - eventually
all
For me this is extremely important, bordering on critical, as I
frequently need to move huge amounts of data onto, around within, and
off of my multi-T file server based on the needs of the client-/du-
jour/.
Thanks!
** Summary changed:
- Memory leak in Nautilus?
+ Memory leak in Nautilus/Kerne
18 matches
Mail list logo
