Sorry Sebastien, I've not forgotten, I've just not had a chance.
The drive that I had reached my quota on had the quota doubled, so I
don't have an immediate way to reproduce the message.
Additionally, my university is preparing for final exams this last month
or so, and I've been insanely
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 29894 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29894
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 29894
can't take screenshot when menu on panel is opened
--
Can't Take Screenshot While A Drop Down Menu Is Open
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286946
You rec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 29894 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29894
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 29894
can't take screenshot when menu on panel is opened
--
scrot commands does not take screenshot when menu is open.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237853
Y
Is this a duplicate of 29894?
or is 29894 a duplicate of this?
--
Can't use any global keyboard shortcuts or hotkeys when applet/menu is open
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10905
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Why is this program in my menu if I don't have the correct dependencies
installed to use it?
I did nothing special, aside from going to system->preferences->main menu and
enabling everything.
This happened in Jaunty Jackalope on march 23.
I'm testing the system on how it is without having any a
no,
its not.
i get the exact same error message.
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
"New Login in a Window" fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283426
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
d
I agree with Paul. As I've stated. I'm trying to help test Jaunty. I'm doing
what amounts to black-box testing. I have not added, removed, or otherwise
changed any programs that are on my system since i upgraded. One of the
packages that I didn't add to my system is reporting an error to me when I
Ah, but again, the menu item still exists. I didn't say that I didn't edit
the menu. I did indeed. But as I just said a moment ago, somehow, somewhere,
there is a bug in this situation.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Sebastien Bacher
wrote:
> the menu item is not displayed if you don't use the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Nautilus reports that it could not transfer the file, and to see the details
section for additional information.
The details section states "Failure" as the reason why the files were not
transfered.
I later learned that the reason was that ac
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24587543/Screenshot.png
--
Nautilus gives completely non-informitive error message when trying to transfer
a file via SFTP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352631
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This issue is reproduce-able.
Steps to reproduce are:
1. Connect to a remote file system using Places -> connect to server ->
ssh protocol.
2. This server needs to have disk usage quotas established for the user
connecting.
3. The user connecting needs to be nearly at their disk
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
When trying to open a .html file on a read-only CD that I did not
create, Nautilus asks me if I would like to run the "executable text
file". I am positive that if I'm double clicking on a .html file, I want
to open it in firefox. If i wanted to
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24653514/Screenshot.png
--
Nautilus asks if I would like to run a .html file. I am positive I would not.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353548
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bug
This is not a question, this is a bug report. I am absolutely certain
this is a bug, and I reported it as such.
Nautilus will know that it is an HTML file in the same manner that
Windows Explorer on Windows knows that it is an HTML file. The file
extension exists for a reason. Both for user sanity
This is not a question, this is a bug report. I am absolutely certain
this is a bug, and I reported it as such.
Nautilus will know that it is an HTML file in the same manner that
Windows Explorer on Windows knows that it is an HTML file. The file
extension exists for a reason. Both for user sanity
The CD was provided to me with the book listed here
http://www.cfm.brown.edu/people/gk/books.html#mpi
I am currently not at my apartment, so I will check when I return.
I do not know if the file is marked as executable. But as I discussed
above, why would it matter?
-Mike
--
Nautilus asks if
Also, it should be noted that when accessing my server (where the file
on the cd drive) through places->connect to server-> using ssh, that
double clicking it immediately opens it in firefox.
How can I discover the filesystem type on the cd when not physically
there? df doesn't have it, nautilus->
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 14335 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14335
How can I find the file system type?
Here is a screenshot of the file permissions, I apologize for not
getting this earlier.
** Attachment added: "executable?.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24701738/exe
I'm sorry, I don't believe that this is an invalid bug.
There should be no menu entries, hidden or displayed, for programs that
will not work as my system is. If this menu entry requires an additional
package to work, that package should either be marked as a direct
dependency (Not a suggested pac
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
"New Login in a Window" fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283426
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
I will do so when I have the opportunity.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Sebastien Bacher
wrote:
> the issue is rather a gvfs one, could you:
> - run GVFS_DEBUG=1 /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd -r
> - try copying using gvfs-copy
> - copy the log for each command to the bug?
>
> ** Package changed: nautil
No idea. I remove empathy as soon as I install.
--
Empathy preserves configuration information upon apt-get purge
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs
Surprisingly, this bug no longer exists due to changes in the connect to
server dialog.
I'm quite happy that the connect to server dialog has been streamlined, but
very un-impressed that GNOME did nothing about this
for nearly two years (and however long before I reported the bug)
Since the bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
Evince doesn't display the pdf document found here: http://smartbear.com
/best-kept-secrets-of-peer-code-review/ correctly. Instead, it displays
"This document requires adobe reader 6.01 or later"
** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undec
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
The dialog should have a title for the password dialog.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Nov 10 13:57:21 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release Candidate i386
(20091020.3)
Package: gvfs
** Attachment added: "Screen capture of the problem."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35493216/Screenshot.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35493217/Dependencies.txt
--
Connect to server dialog password prompt has title "Untitled Window"
https://bugs.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
Consider the use case where a user is attempting to connect to two
different servers, with two different accounts, and two different
passwords. This is completely possible, but if the user attempts this
using book marks in the places menu, hitting bo
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35494047/Screenshot.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35494048/Dependencies.txt
--
Connect to server password dialog does not indicate which server is being
connected to, which use
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gvfs
A better response might be to simply reattempt connecting, without
showing the users an error at all.
Laymen likely won't immediately understand that they took too long to
type their passwords.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Nov 10 1
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-1.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35494314/Screenshot-1.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35494315/Dependencies.txt
--
Connect to server dialog gives cryptic error when timeout occurs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Do you happen to know the bug number? I'd like to follow it.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Sebastien Bacher
wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been
> reported, but feel free to report any other bugs you find.
>
> ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Un
So is this bug invalid or not?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Igor wrote:
> Account information is stored in ~/.mission-control. After you delete
> files, you have to restart (services or simply computer) to take effect.
> Or probably purge telepathy-mission-control-*.
>
> --
> Empathy preserve
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gdm
At the log in screen
Choose the accessibility option on the lower right, to the left of the
date
Choose "Enhance contrast in colors"
De-select "Enhance contrast in colors"
The login menu should have changed back to the human theme.
Logging in, an
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35197878/Dependencies.txt
--
Log in screen breaks when using accessability options
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475939
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscrib
I dont see how having the original submitter, me, do anything will be
useful. This is not fixed in 11.04 and was previously considered a
confirmed bug. in fact, sebastian posted the exact line of the code that
causes the problem. Since I dont have 11.10 installed, and this issue
can be confirmed in
I'm sorry, I've graduated from that school and don't have the necessary
equipment to reproduce the bug. Lets close this bug unless something
comes up.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Deskto
It took you guys 5 months to respond to this bug to ask me how to reproduce
it? even though i specifically asked
Could someone tell me what information to supply // how to supply it for
when I return to my apartment?
It would have been a lot more relevant to ask for more information 5 months
I'll look into it when I have time. Give me a few days.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Kamus wrote:
> Dear michael, thanks for you pacient but debug gnome is not so easy and
> canonical don't have enough resources for check all reports, but anyway
> have you tried with newer ubuntu versions if
I can no longer reproduce this issue.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
gnome dies when rapidly switching the screensaver preview in the screensaver
applet
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325808
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Clicking eject from the Nautilus sidebar on a mounted cd displays a
number of errors equal to the number of times clicked - 1, and displays
the disk.
Can this be changed to ignore clicks for the next 3 seconds after
the first, or something s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 14335 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14335
Is it entirely correct to mark bug 14335 as a duplicate of the bug directly
related to FAT file systems? The problem exists in other filesystems as
well, and the behavior is observed whenever a text file (such a
Thanks for following up Sebastien. I have not forgotten! This email thread
is on the top of my inbox. I normally archive anything I don't have to deal
with, so don't worry!
I have not HAD a chance, but luckily I'm not quite so stressed out now,
and I will get you some feedback tonight. I was a
As luck would have it, my apartments internet connection went down last
night, so I wasn't able to get the testing I wanted to do done. I called
up my ISP, and they've assured me that they'll have my connection up and
running this evening, so I'm crossing my fingers.
--
non informative error when
Yes. This bug still effects me, while using Lucid. I cannot test
Maverick at this time.
However, I have additional information: If the filename has a filename
extension that is known by my system to be associated with gedit, the
file opens in gedit with no problem.
If the file has an unknown exte
44 matches
Mail list logo
