--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037196
Title:
Set "network proxy" to none, yet http_proxy env var is still set in
bash after new login
To manage noti
Public bug reported:
I configured a proxy using gnome-control-center (launched via the proxy
config in chromium). I then changed it to "none". After several
restarts, the http_proxy environment variable is _still_ set to what I'd
set it to. I had to add lines to my .bashrc to unset it. In gconf, i
Sorry, I really think this is a bug.
Searching 1177 titles should take less than 1 second, even reading them
off disk. It's not wishlist to say that 10+ seconds is too slow.
ls can read the directory contents in 0.033s. If you're telling me that
it waits to display items until it has also scanned
Then there is a bug. My disk gets 96.5MB average read, according to the
Benchmark utility.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917152
Title:
nautilus has to build search index for the first search, doesn't warn
user what's happening
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
My downloads directory has 1177 files in it. With nautilus opened on
Downloads, I press ctrl F, and type any word. Initial search takes 10+
seconds (presumably to build the index?) Subsequent searches are fast
enough to be useful.
The initial time is a problem, because nautil
Are you typing anywhere near the numpad when it turns on?
The notification that it is turning on would at least rule out your
assertion.
--
mouse keys turns on randomly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, whic
Ah, a comment in that thread is the key to this, I think - shift numlock
is the hotkey that turns the "feature" on and off. I bet that I've been
hitting that shortcut accidentally. Since it's such a "destructive"
shortcut (i.e. it wrecks the number pad's function) could this bug be
resolved by popp
I tried running apport, to no avail. This is still a bug, and occurs
fairly frequently (every couple of days). There seems to be a hotkey on
the numpad which turns it on.
--
mouse keys turns on randomly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508
You received this bug notification because you are a me
This still happens in lucid.
--
mouse keys turns on randomly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192508
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: metacity
In ubuntu 9.10, the default wallpapers would stretch across both screens
(using twinview, resolution is 3360x1050). In ubuntu 10.04, the default
wallpapers do not stretch across both screens, using any of the options.
I have to download a wallpap
Confirmed. The mkfs workaround worked for me.
--
Fails repeatably with "DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound:
The given volume was not found"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458334
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "This is the Xorg.0.log from a non-responsive X
(presumably because bonobo-activation-server wasn't attached)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39744686/Xorg.0.log
--
Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794
You
Ah, I grabbed the wrong thing from /var/log/messages. I zapped X again
and hit the problem. This time, there was no message about compiz
crashing; instead the only message was:
Feb 24 15:18:30 fridge bonobo-activation-server (reubenf-9075): could
not associate with desktop session: Failed to conne
** Attachment added: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39741300/Xorg.0.log
--
Cannot click on anything when logging into Gnome the first time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is s
This happened again, and I was able to get some info from a different
TTY.
Here's the relevant part from /var/log/messages - compiz crashes.
Feb 24 13:17:06 fridge kernel: [349959.691938] compiz.real[22928]:
segfault at 5 ip 08055c3c sp bfc0a410 error 4 in
compiz.real[8048000+34000]
This bug is
Thanks, please see my second comment. This was reproducible until I
rebooted the computer. So this must be an intermittent issue.
--
Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Interestingly, there were several nautilus processes in an
uninterruptible state. I rebooted the computer, and now my desktop /
nautilus is back.
--
Nautilus doesn't load on Gnome startup, or from terminal
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524959
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451273/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451274/XsessionErrors.txt
** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39451275/usr_lib_
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Nautilus won't load on system startup, or from the terminal. I tried the
patched version from https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/454234,
and while that made the eel_preferences message disappear, it didn't
resolve the issue.
ProblemType: B
The patched ppa did not work for me - the error message went away, but
nautilus still fails to load on gnome initialization / manual launch
from the terminal.
This is a critical bug.
--
eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-session
After booting my computer, when first logging into Gnome, nothing
reponds to left or right click events. The GDM login screen _does_
respond to the mouse, so it's only once I'm logged in that the bug
happens. The cursor is visible onscreen a
Come on guys, it's an easy bug to verify, and it's serious. Closing it
doing nobody a favor. I don't use GNOME on a regular basis, so I can't
verify for you.
--
gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25
You received this bug notification because y
Ah.
But konsole (in KDE) *does* have the contents of .bash_profile
successfully picked up. So either gnome-terminal is not picking up the
environment variables set at login, or gnome isn't sourcing
.bash_profile at login.
The .bashrc is ubuntu is complicated and (at least was) partially buggy.
Us
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
The bash started by gnome-terminal (invoked from the Gnome menu) didn't
know it was supposed to be an interactive shell. This means that a
user's .bash_profile is not sourced.
So I edited the gnome-terminal applet to add the option --comma
Sorry, but you're wrong. This is a bug in the UI design.
It's a disk usage analyzer. If I "scan home", baobob should be able to
indicate to me that there are large files in my home directory taking up
space. I'm not asking you to show me the files directly - just make the
UI clearer so that you ca
This is still a problem. The output doesn't show that the files are in
/home/reubenf.
Furthermore, it's gotten worse.
The "usage" percentage next to "reubenf" (if I run "scan home") is
ALWAYS "100%", and ALWAYS the total size of it + subfolders. It should
show how much of the overall usage is act
Understood that it's not a valid jpeg, but I don't think completely
crapping out is the right response from Gimp. Ideally it would say "this
does not look like a valid JPEG, but here it is anyway". The KDE apps
(gwenview, konqueror, etc) all open it silently, which is perhaps
correct given their us
Interesting that it worked for you. Hopefully you're on a later RC than
I am.
--
GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs
2.4.0-RC / gutsy
--
GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gimp
See attached file. When I open it with GIMP, I get the error message:
JPEG Image Message: Not a JPEG file: starts with 0x42 0x4d.
As I user I don't care. Also, I note that KDE apps can open it.
** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Attachment added: "rubberchicken.jpg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9970564/rubberchicken.jpg
--
GIMP can't open JPEG for editing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152331
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gimp in ub
Respectfully, I disagree with it being obvious. I'm an experienced user,
and I did not find the output at all obvious. The problem is that the
meaning of the "home" folder, i.e. the folder at the top of the listing,
is overloaded. It contains a sum of ALL of the sub folders, plus a
"phantom" group
I understand, but the output does not indicate that the used space is
directly *in* the home folder. It lists /home/reuben as being 100%, and
then the summation underneath (the subdirs) adds up to only, say, 50%.
It is not clear that the home directory itself has files that are taking
up the space.
Yes, this is easily reproducible.
1) Copy a DVD ISO image to your home folder. Name it .bigfile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd ~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -al .bigfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 reuben reuben 3740401664 2007-05-18 08:02 .bigfile
2) Run disk analyzer
3) Where is it?
--
Disk Usage Analyzer does not
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
My home directory was full but I didn't know why. I ran disk usage
analyzer (baobob). The %s of all listed items added up to about 8%. The
biggest listed item was a folder named mp3, which was about 2.5GB. I dug
around using the CLI, and found an 11GB .xse
36 matches
Mail list logo
