[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2011-02-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dbus Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (40270). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37181 Title: at_console does not adapt to console changes -- desktop-b

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2011-01-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dbus Importance: Medium => Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (40270). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37181 Title: at_console does not adapt to console changes -- desktop-b

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2008-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
We use PolicyKit now, which restricts such actions to the current foreground console. Thus this is not an issue any more. ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37181 You received this bug

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2007-10-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dbus Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- desktop-bugs mailing l

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-12-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: dbus (upstream) Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/37181 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
This implements step (1) of the previous plan, gets rid of the invasive broken patch, and restores compatibility with upstream semantics: dbus (1.0.2-1ubuntu2) feisty; urgency=low . * debian/patches/80-dbus-change-at-console-policy.patch: - Throw away the previous complicated and broken

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
** Bug watch added: Freedesktop Bugzilla #9327 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 ** Also affects: dbus (upstream) via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://laun

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
I discussed this again with Sebastian. Our new strategy is: (1) Change the meaning of at_console="true" back to upstream semantics: this applies if the user is on a local console, regardless of whether it is the foreground console. (2) File a bug upstream asking for a new mode 'at_console="foreg

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-12-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Closing unrelated hal task. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/37181 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-09-10 Thread Zunbeltz Izaola
Has been done any work at this bug for edgy? Would it be fixed for the edgy release? -- at_console does not adapt to console changes https://launchpad.net/bugs/37181 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 37181] Re: at_console does not adapt to console changes

2006-05-11 Thread Martin Pitt
For the record, g-p-m and g-v-m has been changed to use check- foreground-console now, so they work around this bug and do not interfere with peer instances any more. This doesn't prevent a process of a nonactive user from messing with power management, though. But I'm afraid this hack has to do fo