you can add "deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/ddebs feisty main
universe" to your /etc/apt/sources.list; then do a sudo apt-get update,
and you will get the debug packages.
Not all of them are there, but still...
--
[feisty] launching gnome-terminal w/geometry argument segfaults
https://launc
duh. My gnome-terminal is 2.17.91-0ubuntu1,
yours is 2.17.92-0ubuntu1.
Let me update mine, and check.
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
[feisty] launching gnome-terminal w/geometry argument segfaults
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88489
--
desktop
SB, I could not reproduce it on mine, even with windows maxed out.
Feisty up-to-date, gnome-terminal 2.17.92-0ubuntu1, X86_64.
--
[feisty] launching gnome-terminal w/geometry argument segfaults
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88489
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 81670 ***
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 81670
failed to initialize HAL : gdm init script priority should be at least equal
to dbus one
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 82227 ***
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 82227
[apport] evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_closure_invoke()
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 82227
[ap
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 82373 ***
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 82373
segfault in gnome-keyboard-properties
** Changed in: control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 82373
segfault in gnome-keyboard
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 88489 ***
Duplicate of bug # 88489
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 88489
[feisty] launching gnome-terminal w/geometry argument segfaults
--
[apport] gnome-terminal
Confirmed on Evolution 2.9.92-0ubuntu1. I did a quick search upstream,
and did not find a similar bug. Guess it will need an upstream bug.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Evolution need to be restarted to list a new category (contact)
https://launchpa
Opened new Gnome bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413600
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #413600
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413600
** Also affects: evolution (upstream) via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413600
Importance: Unknown
Statu
By the way -- Mathieu, thanks for the nice description & steps to
reproduce. I shamelessly copied then into the upstream bug.
--
Evolution need to be restarted to list a new category (contact)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89011
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
** Attachment added: "apport-retrace -d"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6590337/89055.retraced
--
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()"
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89055
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desk
Thanks for the bug report. Yes, it may have been already reported,
but... I would like to know if you can reproduce it.
If you can reproduce it -- now if you are familiar with Valgrind... I
would like to know if you could reproduce it under Valgrind See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Valgrind).
Thnak yo
Per the dependencies list may not not related to Bug #85776 -- he has
the correct level of GTK2.
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()"
https://launc
Yes indeed, it was already known. Real, original, upstream bug is
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316390
--
Evolution need to be restarted to list a new category (contact)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89011
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
If we can simplify the life of the casual user, I cannot see why not to
do it -- mostly if it is a question of activating an existing option.
Nevertheless, the wording should still change to something like "HP Jet
Direct/Raw device".
Just saying "HP Jet Direct" confuses the hell out of someone th
This would be good. Giving summaries per directory does not fully
reflect fs usage.
** Changed in: baobab (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Changed in: baobab (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
--
No summary per partition
https://launchpad.net/bugs/860
** Attachment added: "Summary display after scan"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6599605/baobab.png
--
baobab displays wrong totals after scanning FS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89223
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-utils
Feisty up-to-date (Friday March 02 2007)
gnome-utils 2.17.92-0ubuntu1
ran baobab, and requested a scan of the fs. It resulted in the root
wrongly being shown red. See the attached screenshots.
df -k output:
# df -k
Filesystem 1K-bl
** Attachment added: "display expanding /media one level"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6599606/baobab-2.png
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-utils
+ Feisty up-to-date (Friday March 02 2007)
+ gnome-utils 2.17.92-0ubuntu1
ran baobab, and requested a scan of the fs. I
I have changed the startup, putting dbus as S12, and leaving the rest as
is. So far, no problems.
--
failed to initialize HAL : gdm init script priority should be at least equal to
dbus one
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81670
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
** Attachment added: "retraced report"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6600864/89277.retrace
--
[apport] rhythmbox-metadata crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89277
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list
apport-retrace output & warnings:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/crash$ apport-retrace -d -o 89277.retrace 89277
WARNING: library /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstffmpeg.so not known to rhythmbox
0.9.8-0ubuntu2 dependencies (using gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.2-0ubuntu4)
WARNING: library /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.1
looks related to bug # 81670.
--
disk on desktop and in places menu
https://launchpad.net/bugs/86800
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 17:11 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Do you still get that problem?
>
I get it every two or three days, most of the times with gmail. Once
Evolution fails to open a session to gmail it keeps on sending out the
same pop-up (error connecting etc, retry or cancel) until I hit
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
--
ntp starts before the network is up in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90267
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
ntp starts before the network is up in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90267
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
I think this is actually related to kubuntu-artwork-usplash, but this
package is not offered as an option.
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: None => usplash
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mozzie
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mozzie =
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs
--
sbackup lock not stored in /var/lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82992
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
2-0ubuntu4
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-config-prefix /gnome-panel-ESZ2ij/ --sm-client-id
117f0100011639826990068040001 --screen 0
ProcCwd: /home/hggdh
ProcEnviron:
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
LANG=e
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6668590/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6668591/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6668592/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
libgtk20.0 2.10.9-0ubuntu2 is installed.
--
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90468
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
tried first run, but no success in reproducing the crash. I will wait to
retry when we have a lot of updates to applications that affect gnome-
panel.
Valgrind reports some accesses tha overlay freed blocks, but nothing
fantastic.
--
[apport] gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()
htt
This is interesting. NTP should, by default, bind to all local
interfaces, on UDP, and should be able to recover by itself.
Can you attach a 'grep ntp /var/log/daemon.log' piece here, long enough
to show the system startup & some few hours of run?
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Import
I will look more closely at what is going on, James. On your last
comment: yes, this is a known, huh, issue/limitation: if there is no
name server resolution available, then fully-qualified hostnames (like
ntp.ubuntu.com, or pool.ntp.org, etc) will not get resolved -- after
all, they do depend on h
and... yes indeed. Per chance I had started my laptop with a wireless
connection, driven by n-m.
Here's the NTP messages for the startup:
Mar 8 18:28:00 localhost ntpd[8566]: ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 7
20:43:39 UTC 2007 (1)
Mar 8 18:28:00 localhost ntpd[8567]: precision = 1.000 usec
Mar
more digging in required (thanks, Matt, your comments, and of those in
#ubuntu-bugs helped a lot).
I am always amazed by the depth of my ignorance...
/etc/network/if-(up|down|post-down|pre-up).d scripts are the
responsibility of each package: NTP, NTPdate, and others. These scripts
are executed w
There is a comment in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399905 about this issue, and it refers to an
upstream bug (https://ntp.isc.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=51) where it is
strongly recommended not to bounce ntpd on I/F status changes.
This is (probably) the reason why /etc/network/
Just did it. It still reports the root as almost full.
Expanding the fs that is reporting full... I see it is doing so on a
saved VMWare image (pre-allocated space).
I am attaching two screenshots for it. Also, there seems to be something
not quite correct in the VMWare saved image, and I will ha
** Attachment added: "detailed screenshot"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6724785/baobab-2.png
--
baobab displays wrong totals after scanning FS
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89223
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Package: gnome-utils 2.17.92-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: gnome-screenshot --interactive
ProcCwd: /home/hggdh
ProcEnviron:
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
Signal: 11
SourcePackage
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6724848/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6724849/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6724850/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
Ah, OK.
So usage is relative to the total amount of used space, not to the
filesystem size. In other words, all scans will always show 100% usage
at the root. Even more, it will show 100% at the largest branch.
Is this really useful? Please note: I am actually asking, not being
pedantic. I myself
Ah, OK.
So usage is relative to the total amount of used space, not to the
filesystem size. In other words, all scans will always show 100% usage
at the root. Even more, it will show 100% at the largest branch.
Is this really useful? Please note: I am actually asking, not being
pedantic. I myself
** Attachment added: "retrace"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6730771/91195.retrace
--
[apport] gnome-screenshot crashed with SIGSEGV in
g_hash_table_foreach_remove_or_steal()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91195
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: yelp
yelp crashes whenever/wherever called called.
Looks like a duplicate of bug #91716. Not sure it is yelp, or glibc.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Mon Mar 12 13:36:44 2007
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04
ExecutablePath: /usr
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6756952/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6756953/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6756954/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment ad
I am confirming this. In my case the crash is on an AMD64, but the stack
trace is quite similar. Setting my bug as a duplicate.
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh inst
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
--
[apport] gnome-help cra
** Tags added: need-i386-retrace
--
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91716
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
** Tags added: need-i386-retrace
** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace
--
[apport] gnome-help crashed with SIGSEGV in
pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2()
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91720
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
retrace from bug # 91720 (AMD64).
** Attachment added: "stack trace"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6759049/91720.retrace
--
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91716
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
--
[apport] gnome-help cra
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
** Changed in: gnome-sudoku (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-sudoku => yelp
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first sta
ah well. The attachment I just created displays completely messed up
here (no LFs). Inlining it just in case.
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: yelp
Stacktrace:
#0 window_do_load (window=0x98a040, doc_info=0x897330, frag_id=0x0) at
yelp-window.c:1003
error = (GError *) $2 = -99
.
Thread 3 (pr
Rejecting, this is not a bug, but an usage question.
Please go to http://ubuntuforums.org/ and ask/search there. You will
certainly be helped.
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
Network transfer
https://launchpad.net/bugs/89914
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
Yes, look at bug # 91716. This is a new bug cuz the traces do not match.
--
Yelp crashes on starting
https://launchpad.net/bugs/34384
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
James, you are correct. I had initially rejected this bug for NTP and
upstart, but I am starting to wonder.
The more I read... the more it seems that current (i.e., 4.2.0) NTP code
should not be started before a valid network interface is available.
There is a comment in the NTP Bugzilla that som
I have asked for opinions from the assignee for bug # 82335 (it might
need to be considered for the n-m work there).
--
ntp starts before the network is up in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90267
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
Duplicate of bug # 91716
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
Duplicate of bug # 91716
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] yelp crashed with SIGSEGV on first start in fresh install
-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
Thank you for your bug. This particular problem has already been
reported, so we are setting your report as a duplicate. Please do not
hesitate in reporting other bugs you find, as this helps us make Ubuntu
better.
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Sourcepa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
Duplicate of bug # 91716. A fix has been released, and should be
available shortly.
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 91716
[apport] y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 91716 ***
Thank you for your bug report. This particular bug had already been
reported, but do not hesitate in reporting any other bugs you find.
Duplicate of bug #91716
** Changed in: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bu
James, with the changes that Tollef made for n-m, do you still
experience this problem?
--
ntp starts before the network is up in feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/90267
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Similar here on a laptop with AMD64, but it is most visible on shutdown,
when I lose usplash when shutting down dbus & friends. Takes about a
minute to shutdown dbus.
On startup... I will check next boot.
--
hal takes about 60 seconds to start up
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92647
--
desktop-bug
startup hal takes more than 30 seconds. On shutdown, for my surprise, it
was seamless, with absolutely no waits. This is today, yesterday it was
not behaving like this.
--
hal takes about 60 seconds to start up
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92647
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubu
Restarted hald in verbose mode. first timestamp is 09:31:43.595, last
timestamp is 09:32:32.162, so about 50 seconds.
There is a forced 1000 ms wait at blockdev (see timestamps 09:32:10.650
onward) for each device found; this piece of init takes about 20 seconds
to complete.
Have not yet looked f
Please open a terminal, and start evolution from there. Then please post
the generated messages here.
--
Evolution upgrade disables spamfilter (upgrade edgy to feisty)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91166
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
It looks like you have the bogofilter junk plugin enabled. Only one junk
plugin can be enabled at any time.
Please verify if indeed bogofilter is enabled (Edit/Plugins); if it is,
please disable it, and restart Evolution.
--
Evolution upgrade disables spamfilter (upgrade edgy to feisty)
https://
no problem, closing for now then. Feel free to reopen if you get the
issue again.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Rejected
--
[apport] network-admin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://launchpad.net/bugs/84116
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubu
@Fridtjorf:
I agree, this is, probably, a security concern. But there are some
mitigations: RC4-128 is not that weak at all, and there are other
safeguards that can be deployed -- like encrypting the e-mail before
sending. What I am trying to say is this is not a critical issue, and
there is reall
-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: evolution-2.10 --sm-config-prefix /evolution-2.10-b1nwfW/
--sm-client-id 117f010001174145207009124 --screen 0
ProcCwd: /home/hggdh
ProcEnviron:
SHELL=/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6899663/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6899664/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6899665/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
sbackup lock not stored in /var/lock
https://launchpad.net/bugs/82992
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
@kleinerdrache: any updates on this?
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => hggdh
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
Evolution upgrade disables spamfilter (upgrade edgy to feisty)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91166
--
OK. Closing. Please re-open if you do not agree.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Needs Info => Rejected
--
Evolution upgrade disables spamfilter (upgrade edgy to feisty)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/91166
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
801 - 876 of 876 matches
Mail list logo
