Hi
I know many people will not like me :) , but this just a question
please don´t hate me :)
is there any plan to drop xscreensaver or at less do a heavy change on
it (the ugly lock login didn´t change since I think gnome 2 or even
before and always you have to reboot your machine if you lock
Why can't the necessary file be generated by Windows users?
because configure doesn't run for people using standard Windows tools.
Daniel,
can you be a bit more specific ? What exactly does not allow people to
run configure under Windows ? Lots of projects build fine under windows
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:24:38PM +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
Why can't the necessary file be generated by Windows users?
because configure doesn't run for people using standard Windows tools.
Daniel,
can you be a bit more specific ? What exactly does not allow people
Daniel Veillard wrote:
can you be a bit more specific ? What exactly does not allow people to
run configure under Windows ? Lots of projects build fine under windows
using the standard autotools set.
The serious libxml2 contributors on Windows don't run cygwin or migwin.
Most of the
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:53 +0300, regatta wrote:
Hi
I know many people will not like me :) , but this just a question
please don´t hate me :)
is there any plan to drop xscreensaver or at less do a heavy change on
it (the ugly lock login didn´t change since I think gnome 2 or even
before
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 07:44 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:53 +0300, regatta wrote:
Hi
I know many people will not like me :) , but this just a question
please don´t hate me :)
is there any plan to drop xscreensaver or at less do a heavy change on
it
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 08:46 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 07:44 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:53 +0300, regatta wrote:
Hi
I know many people will not like me :) , but
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 13:54 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
Please read the original thread, all of this has already been discussed:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.desktop/24408
And:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.desktop/21149
and:
I've been advocating a simple enter-your-email-we-won't-spam-you form
I can't imagine any casual system will provide very reliable data so why
worry about an email address. If it is the first time a person starts
gnome, maybe ask them to let us know they are running gnome. Also, what
about the
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:37 +1200, John Williams wrote:
Essentially we propose modifying the GNOME About box to include a toggle
that indicate the user's permission to activate a program that would
periodically contact a central GNOME server. Information that would be
transmitted and
On Maw, 2005-07-05 at 16:21, Robert Love wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:37 +1200, John Williams wrote:
Essentially we propose modifying the GNOME About box to include a toggle
that indicate the user's permission to activate a program that would
periodically contact a central GNOME
Hi William,
It does indeed seem that you have address many of our concerns with
respect to the screen saver. Bastien filled me in. We are going to
discuss including it in Fedora today and will most likely get some test
packages and play around with it and give you feedback.
On Wed,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 14:11 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
Merging items could be useful. However, I don't think just shoving the
same existing UI into multiple tabs in a single dialog will help really.
It will just mean less things in the menu, and more confusion to users
who are looking for
Hi everybody!,
I haven't seen any proposal in the whole 2.11 period, so here's one to
break the ice: I'm proposing services-admin from gnome-system-tools for
2.12, the last g-s-t version (1.3.0[.x]) compiles it by default,
featuring a dead easy GUI [1] to activate/deactivate services, both in
g-s-t is already part of gnome, right? So presumably including
additional g-s-t tools is up to the discretion of the g-s-t maintainers?
-Rob
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:46 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi everybody!,
I haven't seen any proposal in the whole 2.11 period, so here's one to
break
That's close but that talks about Preferences and Administration.
I'm talking about System Tools and Administration.
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 06:43 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Rob Adams
I think that the separation of these two menus is confusing.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:31:58PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:37 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Some may think that it could encourage people to add more capplets, but
that's already happening, in the last 2 releases we've added Multimedia
systems selector,
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:15 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
In these cases, it would be good to be able to find a way to get
access without too much trouble like a troubleshooter system that
tells you where to go if the default multimedia stuff doesn't work.
I don't want to be too sarcastic
Hi,
Looking at the schedule I thought I'd missed the time period left for
new modules, but looking again it appears we still have a small amount
of time. I'd like to propose eggcups for 2.12.
For more information about eggcups, see:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 16:48 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Join Friends of GNOME and celebrate easy to use software for $OS! (email
form)
What question are we asking? :-)
I *think* we're asking 'how many users of GNOME are there', not 'how
many discovered gnome-about in their panel and
--- Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:37 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Some may think that it could encourage people to add more capplets, but
that's already happening, in the last 2 releases we've added Multimedia
systems selector, Remote desktop and
quote who=Luis Villa
I *think* we're asking 'how many users of GNOME are there'
Broadly, yes, but what we've discussed is establishing multiple data sources
(however reliable, having datapoints with caveats is better than nothing) as
well as providing encouragement through momentum.
- Jeff
--
quote who=Rob Adams
That's close but that talks about Preferences and Administration. I'm
talking about System Tools and Administration.
In many ways, they're in it together. One way of getting rid of crapplets is
by integrating them into more useful locations - you could do the same thing
23 matches
Mail list logo
