> Then I don't see how Alan's point can be applied. Someone with a
> Bomb... game should be free to label "GNOME certified" if it
> happens to satisfy the technical aspects. And it should be clear
> that it's a self-certificate. Maybe it should not be called a
> certificate after all. "GNOME Fr
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 19:36 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > You also want to change something in config_tool_changed(), I think.
> > >
> > like checking if the command entered by the user is correct? Added to
> > the patch also.
>
> Great!
>
> Just one last comment: at the end of fill_clock_app
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 23:26 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> Today at 22:42, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'd really prefer to keep distributing standalone
> > packages, since it allows me to do more frequent releases.
>
> Nobody would object if gtk-engines got more frequent releas
Today at 22:42, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
> Personally, I'd really prefer to keep distributing standalone
> packages, since it allows me to do more frequent releases.
Nobody would object if gtk-engines got more frequent releases. :)
I.e. this should not impact a decision, since if clearlooks
Hi everyone,
Being one of the authors of Clearlooks, I think it would be a good
idea to let myself be heard :)
First I'd like to apologize for this new thread. I only just
subscribed to this mailinglist, so I can't reply to the previous
thread.
I'm very excited that Clearlooks will be part of GN
Heya hackers,
We've just written a guide to help you migrate your modules to
gnome-doc-utils, which will immensly help both documentors and
translators.
Just head straight over to:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeDocUtilsMigrationHowTo
The early winners are bug-buddy (which shaunm converted) and
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 12:03 +0100, Mark McLoughlin a écrit :
> 1. Session Services vs. Session Managed Apps
>
>
> The idea here is that the concept of "saving session state" has no
> relevance to most of the programs which are currently controlle
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 12:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 7/19/05, Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:31 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > On 7/19/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The naming of the packages could also be such that there is no ch
Hi all,
The number of keywords[1] in bugzilla is ridiculously huge making them
almost completely useless. We've identified a few dozen to nuke as a
starting point in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302635,
but thought we'd give people a chance to complain as there may be
reason to save
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 16:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:41 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hi Rodrigo,
> >
> > On Tue, July 19, 2005 13:36, Rodrigo Moya said:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This patch adds support for SuSE's YAST datetime config tool in the
> > > clock apple
Today at 16:37, Dan Winship wrote:
> Could we just package up the results of the jhbuild in a dumb,
> completely mechanical way, such that installing the packages would be
> exactly equivalent to running jhbuild? ie, it wouldn't replace or
> conflict with your existing GNOME packages, it would jus
On 7/19/05, Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:31 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 7/19/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The naming of the packages could also be such that there is no chance of
> > > conflicting with your vendor gnome, current ver
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:31 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 7/19/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The naming of the packages could also be such that there is no chance of
> > conflicting with your vendor gnome, current version or later installed.
>
> I think Dan was suggesting (a
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 12:22 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Well, a service really wants to acquire a dbus name as early in it's
> > lifecycle as possible. gnome_service_initialize needs to be called
> > really early on. It's a blocking function and--like you've pointed
> > out--it changes the
> Yeah, figured it would have to be per-distro*. With a little help from
> vmware or something along those lines that should be too hard to automate.
That'll be slow. Use a chroot. :-)
- Jeff
--
OSCON 2005: August 1st-5th http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2005/
All this sel
On 7/19/05, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > If we're going to throw massive tarballs over the wall, might as
> > well add the extra few megs and just make them debug from the start, no?
> >
> > Luis (noting that he has no idea if this would actually *work*)
>
> This has been done
Dan Winship wrote:
Could we just package up the results of the jhbuild in a dumb,
completely mechanical way, such that installing the packages would be
exactly equivalent to running jhbuild? ie, it wouldn't replace or
conflict with your existing GNOME packages, it would just install
everything i
> If we're going to throw massive tarballs over the wall, might as
> well add the extra few megs and just make them debug from the start, no?
>
> Luis (noting that he has no idea if this would actually *work*)
This has been done a few times in the history of GARNOME. It works fine, tho
it's ea
On 7/19/05, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:37 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 16:06 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > On 7/18/05, Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:54 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:37 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 16:06 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 7/18/05, Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:54 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > > What's so difficult about jhbuild? Couldn't we make just make
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> I think I'm with Matthias on this - make distcheck shows plenty of
> issues that aren't going to affect anyone in reality, and no maintainer
> wants to be pestered every day about the latest random thing that's
> gotten screwed up.
>
> If p
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 16:06 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 7/18/05, Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:54 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > What's so difficult about jhbuild? Couldn't we make just make it easier
> > > (such as having jhbuild autodetect stuff in /u
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:41 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On Tue, July 19, 2005 13:36, Rodrigo Moya said:
> > Hi
> >
> > This patch adds support for SuSE's YAST datetime config tool in the
> > clock applet.
> >
> > Ok to commit?
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> Some comments (I might be
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 à 13:45 +0100, Mark McLoughlin a écrit :
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 10:20 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> > 1) Add deprecation notices to the docs for all of those keys
> >
> > 2) Remove the setting of "default" in gnome-wm
> >
> > 3) Remove the wm-properties code i
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Alan Horkan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Ikke wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:42:09 +0200
> > From: Ikke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> > Subject: Re: make distcheck
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 10:20 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 1) Add deprecation notices to the docs for all of those keys
>
> 2) Remove the setting of "default" in gnome-wm
>
> 3) Remove the wm-properties code in gnome-control-center/capplets and
> libwindow-settings (wm-exec.c, wm-li
Hi Rodrigo,
On Tue, July 19, 2005 13:36, Rodrigo Moya said:
> Hi
>
> This patch adds support for SuSE's YAST datetime config tool in the
> clock applet.
>
> Ok to commit?
Thanks for the patch.
Some comments (I might be totally wrong since I don't have the whole
code here):
+if (tool && g
Hi
This patch adds support for SuSE's YAST datetime config tool in the
clock applet.
Ok to commit?
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gnome-panel/applets/clock/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revisi
Hey,
(Just picking some random comments to reply to)
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 11:03 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> > If that is the case, I'm not sure why
> > we're doing this ... certainly in the case of the panel, there's no
> > reason to delay the panel startup that long; the curr
Hi,
So, I've been thinking about what we're trying to achieve here and
whether the current proposal really meets our goals, so I thought we'd
try and just write down exactly what the goals are.
Here's a first attempt ...
Cheers,
Mark.
Goals:
==
1. Separate notion of sessio
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 14:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 20:23 +0200, Ikke wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:28 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > > I think the advantages of adding make distcheck are bigger than the
> > > > disadvantages.
> > >
> > > OK, but what are t
31 matches
Mail list logo
