Em Sáb, 2006-04-22 às 18:44 -0700, Michael Frank escreveu:
> On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 09:05 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 01:06 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> > > Can I suggest to start a new thread here on d-d-l about the applet
> > > infrastructure [1]
> >
> > FWIW, thi
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 09:05 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 01:06 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> > Can I suggest to start a new thread here on d-d-l about the applet
> > infrastructure [1]
>
> FWIW, this is a proposed SoC project. I have lots of ideas (and other
> people a
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > On 4/20/06, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] I'm going to beat up on you until you start writing 'GNOME' correctly!
We know you like Gnome but there is no need to shout.
Okay if it is an acronym then the only correct way to write it is
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Travis Watkins wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:51:44 -0500
> From: Travis Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Proposal for Alacarte in 2.16
>
> Alacarte[1] is a menu editor that makes it easy to completely
> customiz
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:09:32 +0100
> From: Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: desktop-devel-list
> Subject: Re: Gnome 2 infinity and beyond [was Re: Tango and 2.16]
>
> Alan Horkan wrote:
> > I put serious
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Dan Winship wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:41:14 -0400
> From: Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> desktop-devel-list
> Subject: Re: Gnome 2 infinity and beyond [was Re: Tango and 2.16]
>
>
As some people might like this... Thanks Frederic!
Forwarded Message
From: Frederic Peters <>
To: Ikke <>
Subject: Re: JHBuild setup and RSS feeds
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:37:57 +0200
Ikke wrote:
> As I proposed on GNOME's desktop-devel list today, it'd be really cool
> if the
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 10:01 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 4/22/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Remember to consider !Linux. Linux is currently the only HAL-supporting
> > platform (yes, others are close, but will they be finished for our
> > release timeframe?).
>
> I didn't fo
[Andrew responded off list, and got it just right, so I'm forwarding.]
On 4/21/06, Andrew Sobala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Graveley wrote:
> >
> > HELLO?! Check 1-2-3?
> >
> > The discussion *was* about Tomboy. An small app I wrote that people
> > like, and which could benefit from adopt
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 14:39 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:51:21 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Heya,
> >
> > I thought a couple of people might be interested (in fact, I've already
> > received a few mails about it).
>
> Hi Bastien,
> you might want to have a look
Hi, Ted:
Judging from the changelog:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/vino/ChangeLog?rev=1.133&view=markup
and this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159874
development might best be described right now as 'very slow' :) You
can find the primary maintainer's email in there by skimming a
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 10:01 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> I didn't forget it; I was only responding to the linux-2.4 part of the
> thread. I think the alternative OS side of things has already been
> addressed sufficiently[1,2,3,4,5], and given that we have other HAL
> dependencies in the desktop
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 08:58 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > 2.2: Make it sticky (stays on top of windows).
>
> Oh great, two definitions of 'sticky' wasn't enough...we just had to
> add a third, didn't we? (Or was this already added by "Sticky Notes"
> and I just didn't notice since I haven't rea
On 4/22/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember to consider !Linux. Linux is currently the only HAL-supporting
> platform (yes, others are close, but will they be finished for our
> release timeframe?).
I didn't forget it; I was only responding to the linux-2.4 part of the
thread.
GARNOME has been "successfully" built on a number of older systems.
We do make in clear in the README that some features will not work
without a 2.6.x kernel.
-Joseph
=
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 09:22 -0600, Elijah Newren wr
Hi Filippo,
> > I thought a couple of people might be interested (in fact, I've already
> > received a few mails about it).
>
> Hi Bastien,
> you might want to have a look at gbluezconf also:
>
> http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~ckt/gbluezconf/
the latest version is 00.21 and it is using the new D-Bus A
I'm trying to find out if anyone is actively developing vino at this
point in time. I had a few questions for them on what would be
involved in introducing true RSA key encryption.
Thanks.
--Ted
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-li
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 09:22 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 4/22/06, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 00:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > > This situation is slightly different in that we're replacing
> > > functionality; my reaction would be that the small nu
On 4/22/06, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 00:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > This situation is slightly different in that we're replacing
> > functionality; my reaction would be that the small number of users still
> > using 2.4 kernels can install battstat (
> 2.2: Make it sticky (stays on top of windows).
Oh great, two definitions of 'sticky' wasn't enough...we just had to
add a third, didn't we? (Or was this already added by "Sticky Notes"
and I just didn't notice since I haven't really used it?)
;-)
___
Hi all,
Since GTK+ 2.10 will have GtkStatusIcon, we'll finally get rid of the
eggtray* code. The only piece left in libegg will be eggtraymanager.
I believe it makes sense to make the code live in the notification area
(instead of just having a copy there) and to "deprecate" eggtray*.
This also
Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 08:48 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit :
> > It definitely makes sense to let the user be able to choose another
> > screenreader than the one(s) we provide, so they can install another
> > one and easily use it.
>
> This sounds like a general accessibility question for the d
Darn...somehow I pressed "Send" before completing my e-mail. I think
it's the stupid touch pad on my laptop: it seems to be producing a lot
of stray clicks these days. :-(
I'll finish this sentence...
> Finally, we've a number of very positive comments regarding Orca in
> terms of the quality of
Hi All:
> Thanks for working on a summary. This is very useful :-)
No problem! My hope here is that we can reach a good practical
conclusion.
> Is there any way to evaluate what's missing in Orca (or in Gnopernicus)
> compared to the Gnopernicus (resp. Orca)?
The two main gaps between Orca and
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:51:21 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I thought a couple of people might be interested (in fact, I've already
> received a few mails about it).
Hi Bastien,
you might want to have a look at gbluezconf also:
http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~ckt/gbluezconf/
thanks,
filippo
Trying to keep the dependencies issue out of it for a moment, here are
some more thoughts, assuming that we are talking about replacing Sticky
Notes with Tomboy.
1. Can we rename Tomboy to Sticky Notes, or at least change the tooltip
to "Notes" rather than "Tomboy Notes", so it is more meaninful t
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:58 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> If nobody responds with any serious objections by Monday, then let's
> just assume it's in.
That's wildly premature.
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 10:23 +0200, David Neary wrote:
>
> Elijah Newren wrote:
> > 1. gtk-sharp isn't (yet) in the bindings set (and I haven't seen it
> > proposed by its maintainer(s))
> > 2. gtk-sharp isn't yet a blessed binding dependency (only python is so
> > far; though there doesn't seem to
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 00:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> This situation is slightly different in that we're replacing
> functionality; my reaction would be that the small number of users still
> using 2.4 kernels can install battstat (hell, they've got it installed
> already; they just need to
Elijah Newren wrote:
> 1. gtk-sharp isn't (yet) in the bindings set (and I haven't seen it
> proposed by its maintainer(s))
> 2. gtk-sharp isn't yet a blessed binding dependency (only python is so
> far; though there doesn't seem to be any objection so far so this one
> looks pretty good if 1 goe
Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 01:06 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> Can I suggest to start a new thread here on d-d-l about the applet
> infrastructure [1]
FWIW, this is a proposed SoC project. I have lots of ideas (and other
people also have) that I really should write down somewhere.
Feel free to
31 matches
Mail list logo
