Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote: As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about dropping reports from 2.14 and below? If there are no objections, I'll start with dropping

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote: As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and below, but I see how that may be a little to aggressive. What about dropping reports from 2.14

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 14:20 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:13:04PM +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote: As far as I am concerned I'd like to drop any reports from 2.16 and below, but I see how that

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Alex Jones
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 16:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: BTW, I'm working on a non-GNOME-dependent replacement to bug-buddy, which will report crashes in the Debian BTS instead. In the future, it should save you the Debian-related bugs (if we can manage the number of bugs...) What's wrong

Re: dropping bug-buddy reports for old version of gnome automatically

2007-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 08 avril 2007 à 16:19 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit : Oh, and a warning: without having some system in place to detect duplicates automatically, you will be overwhelmed. Definitely. This, and the fact such reports are mostly useless without debugging symbols available. I have some

Sticky Windows

2007-04-08 Thread adel
GNOME desktop needs something like this http://www.donelleschi.com/stickywindows/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Sticky Windows

2007-04-08 Thread Thomas Wood
On 08/04/07 21:02, adel wrote: GNOME desktop needs something like this http://www.donelleschi.com/stickywindows/ We look forward to your implementation then. -Thomas ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Sticky Windows

2007-04-08 Thread Hubert Figuiere
adel wrote: GNOME desktop needs something like this http://www.donelleschi.com/stickywindows/ You mean the big white rectangle with the green icon in the middle of the web page? That's very descriptive. Hub ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Button highlighting, middle and right buttons don't work in Xaw application on GNOME desktop

2007-04-08 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Greetings, I'm writing to the desktop developer list about this problem because I'm pretty certain that you're the only group of people who has a chance of being able to figure it out :-). I have maintained a Usenet News Reader called XRN for more years than I care to remember. It is an Xaw

system-monitor branched for GNOME 2.18

2007-04-08 Thread Benoît Dejean
Hello, system-monitor has been branched. The stable releases will now happen in the /branches/gnome-2-18 branch. Developpement happens in /trunk. Bye, -- Benoît Dejean GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html signature.asc Description: Ceci est une

Re: Button highlighting, middle and right buttons don't work in Xaw application on GNOME desktop

2007-04-08 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
Heya, On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 17:16 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: snip/ I'm enjoying all of the benefits of GNOME, but one thing I'm not enjoying is that XRN doesn't work properly on the GNOME desktop. In particular, Xaw button widgets don't seem to function properly in at least two ways, one