Hi,
On 9/18/07, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is simply not true. Checkout KDE
> (http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/), Python
> (http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/) or SDL
> (http://www.libsdl.org/cgi/viewvc.cgi/trunk/) just to take three
> random projects that uses Subvers
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:30:25PM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> In ChangeLog terms, this means
> religiously hitting "C-x 4 a" in Emacs (or whatever your editor uses)
> every time you modify a function or bit of code.
I have now seen a lot of references to "C-x 4 a" in this thread and th
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:15 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 19:11 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 12:27 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:10 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 18:26 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 01:24 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>
> > One reason is: for previous commits. Moving
> > to a generated ChangeLog means losing a certain piece of history
> because
> > many modules have crap log in their history...
>
> Yes. Problem is solved by moving the old ChangeLog. sv
On 9/19/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:02 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> >
> > There is no rational reason why GNOME would need both ChangeLog and
> > svn log.
>
> There *is* a clear reason: offline and tarball use. What you really
> mean is that there
Luca:
Sorry - that was a mispost. I'm not sure how my email browser got so
confused.
Brian
> You don't answer #6. A good answer might be whether the XML formats
> used for saving documents has changed to a new revision in this release.
> I'd focus on mentioning any data formats that are visbil
Luca:
You don't answer #6. A good answer might be whether the XML formats
used for saving documents has changed to a new revision in this release.
I'd focus on mentioning any data formats that are visbile to end users.
This TPT document looks really good, by the way.
Brian
> Il giorno ven, 14
Le mardi 18 septembre 2007 à 18:15 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
> Depends on how you look at it. From far, yes, it looks like just
> s/svn/git, but from near, you see developers hosting their own trees for
> various experimental features, etc. This is how kernel works, and how
> cairo and oth
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:02 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>
> There is no rational reason why GNOME would need both ChangeLog and
> svn log.
There *is* a clear reason: offline and tarball use. What you really
mean is that there is no rational reason why GNOME can't use
auto-generated ChangeLog.
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 19:11 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 12:27 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:10 +0100, John Carr wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 18:26 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 21:31 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
> > > >
On 9/18/07, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People are lazy by default, and the lure of
>
>svn commit -m "quick fix"
>
> is just too big (replace svn with your favorite tool; it happens for all
> of them).
That is simply not true. Checkout KDE
(http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/K
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:11 +0200, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2007-09-16 klockan 21:43 skrev Thomas Vander Stichele:
> > When I'm reading a ChangeLog, I want to know what changed in the
> > software overall; what changes the developers are making, and why they
> > are making them. I don't want to
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 00:13 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> Talking to Daniel "Cheese" Siegel we asked ourselves:
> Why do all GNOME projects have a ChangeLog file?
> Isn't it redundant when you just save a commit message.
We use ChangeLogs because we decided to do so when GNOME started:
http://deve
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 12:30 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 12:57 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:50 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > >
> > > With git, it's simple as well. I could, in principle,
> > > prepare my NEWS entry from git log. But the mess
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 12:57 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:50 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> >
> > With git, it's simple as well. I could, in principle,
> > prepare my NEWS entry from git log. But the messages
> > would no longer be grouped as they are with separate
> >
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:50 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> With git, it's simple as well. I could, in principle,
> prepare my NEWS entry from git log. But the messages
> would no longer be grouped as they are with separate
> ChangeLog files. What's more, it seems most git users
> don't prefix th
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:50 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
>
> With git, it's simple as well. I could, in principle,
> prepare my NEWS entry from git log. But the messages
> would no longer be grouped as they are with separate
> ChangeLog files. What's more, it seems most git users
> don't prefix
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 00:13 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> Hi
>
> Talking to Daniel "Cheese" Siegel we asked ourselves:
> Why do all GNOME projects have a ChangeLog file?
> Isn't it redundant when you just save a commit message.
More than anything else, I use the ChangeLog file to prepare
the NEWS
Hi,
2007/9/18, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 21:43 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 00:13 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Talking to Daniel "Cheese" Siegel we asked ourselves:
> > > Why do all GNOME projects have a Change
Hi all,
Almost all modules had a 2.20.0 release. Thanks everyone! :-)
--lucasr
2007/9/10, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> According to one of the super-cool release team scripts, those modules
> have had zero or just a few releases during the 2.19.x cycle:
>
> Desktop:
> - alacar
gnome-vfs, eel and nautilus has been branched for GNOME 2.20.
The branch name is "gnome-2-20".
Future work on nautilus will be porting it to use gvfs/gio. This work
will happen on a branch though, so I don't expect much work on trunk in
the near future.
___
2007-09-16 klockan 21:43 skrev Thomas Vander Stichele:
> When I'm reading a ChangeLog, I want to know what changed in the
> software overall; what changes the developers are making, and why they
> are making them. I don't want to read about every single small detail
> they changed while making tho
2007-09-18 klockan 06:35 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 21:05 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > On 9/17/07, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 16 septembre 2007 à 09:42 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > > > Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad
gnome-control-center has been branched for GNOME 2.20.
New development in trunk is starting right away, with the following:
* more capplet merging
* speed improvements on startup
* new localization capplet
* libslab/shell improvements
* and lots of bug fixes
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Il giorno ven, 14/09/2007 alle 23.02 +0200, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> hi carlos,
>
> Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 20:48 +0200 schrieb Carlos Garnacho:
> > I've just released system-tools-backends 2.4.0, this release was
> > intended to be synchronized with the 2.20 schedule, and I'd like it to
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
