Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
[0] I'm reasonably sure it has some. not as the one proposed to avoid
pissing off somebody somewhere because we want to be inclusive -- no,
lemme rephrase that: we are *fucking afraid of committment*. seriously:
an abstraction over DVCS? what have we become? are we
On 1/5/09, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
6. Check all the documentation stuff on live.gnome.org that needs to be
updated. That is really important because not everybody is familiar with
git. There should also be a short introduction to git somewhere on the
wiki. And some
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:34:47PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:18 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I am not evading. Stop trying to make this personal. I don't care about
CoC, I don't like you're talking
On ma, 2009-01-05 at 12:32 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 1/5/09, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
6. Check all the documentation stuff on live.gnome.org that needs to be
updated. That is really important because not everybody is familiar with
git. There should also be a
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am I missing something?
Make build.gnome.org work with the new setup; I plan to write some
requirements (nothing fancy, and stuffs that will most probably be
also required elsewhere).
There may also be some other infrastructure systems that would
require some porting
Josselin Mouette wrote:
BTW, do we have the resources to migrate the repository to the SVN 1.5
format? It looks like, independently from other decisions, a quick and
easy way to improve the situation – and to improve it right now, not in
2010.
Olav announced it on October 29th:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
Anyway, I'd rather add John Carr to the sysadmin team. I plan to make a
proposal to switch GNOME to a DVCS where Git works using Johns
suggestion. Then other sysadmins[1] can suggest whatever proposal they
want. These
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 09:51 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit :
It seems pretty clear that the git-over-bzr solution doesn't make the
git users any happier than git-over-svn does, so let's not pretend that
it's any different from doing just bzr. So, given that we seem to have
sysadmin resources
Hi!
Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 16:23 +0100 schrieb Mathias Hasselmann:
First of all I want to thank Behdad and the participants of the survey
for giving us numbers.
Second I want to complain about the direction this discussion takes.
No idea why that many people become personal. This is
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/1/5 Ali Sabil ali.sa...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly
Hello,
I've just created the gnome-2-24 branch for the file-roller SVN module.
As usual the trunk branch will be used to develop the next stable
version, while gnome-2-24 will be used for maintenance of the 2.24.x series.
Happy new year,
Paolo
2009/1/5 Ali Sabil ali.sa...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
the points I made (that you didn't respond
Or just revert the change to ORBit2
Done.
--tml
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 11:23 +0100, Edward Hervey wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 20:32 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 22:46 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
In December I ran a distributed version control system survey for GNOME.
From the survey opening page:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 20:32 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 22:46 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
In December I ran a distributed version control system survey for GNOME.
From the survey opening page:
Thank you for taking the GNOME DVCS Survey. This survey
First of all I want to thank Behdad and the participants of the survey
for giving us numbers.
Second I want to complain about the direction this discussion takes.
No idea why that many people become personal. This is really unpleasant.
Third of all: What so complicated about this migration? As
Believe me, if I had direct control over it, I'd hire Joanie in an
instant. She's an awesome contributor and is the type of person every
project needs.
Will
Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
For whatever it's worth:
Joanmarie Diggs works for Sun on accessibility (mostly Orca).
I happen to be a
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 06:34:47PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:18 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I am not evading. Stop trying to make this personal. I don't care about
CoC, I don't like you're talking to me.
Please. Stop trying to make this look like it's personal and
Ali Sabil a écrit :
That's not what John's proposal is about ! John wants to use the bzr format
as a repository format, and add a git-serve plugin to bzr to be able to
talk to the git clients. In other words, you will be able to access the
same data using either bzr, git or hg.
Well, if people
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 07:00:52AM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
I'd like to help with another path forward, namely native git
repositories since I believe that is what most of the community wants.
As you said, it isn't clear how it could work for non-sysadmins to
come up with clear proposal
I was not planning to do this until .28, however a nice Clutter game
written in Seed was merged in to gnome-games today, and there is some
interest in being able to include this in .26.
I would like to propose Seed (http://live.gnome.org/Seed) as a beta -bindings
module for .26
For those not
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 22:46 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
GNOME contributors with an SVN account who had an SSH key installed on
their account were invited to fill in the survey.
[It is NOT my intention to get all negative here; I understand - and
accept - that projects make decisions and not
A quick addendum, I was incorrect about external dependencies as
gobject-introspection does not seem to be listed as a GNOME external
dependency or module yet, however it seems to be very well received, and
is already receiving broad use (Vala, gnome-shell, several other language
bindings...).
2009/1/6 Robert Carr ca...@rpi.edu:
A quick addendum, I was incorrect about external dependencies as
gobject-introspection does not seem to be listed as a GNOME external
dependency or module yet, however it seems to be very well received, and
is already receiving broad use (Vala, gnome-shell,
Hi,
[Disclaimer: I wasn't involved in the construction or running of the
survey, other than the analysis you saw plus some late feedback on the
survey questions (I think my feedback was merely to suggest the
other answer for contributor types.)]
2009/1/5 Andrew Cowie
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:40:18 -0500 David Zeuthen da...@fubar.dk wrote:
Then what happens when a new version of git with a new feature,
incompatible with the git-serve kludge, is released?
I don't know if you've talked to the git developers, but
they're very firmly against adding any new
So, I'm not a GNOME contributor, but I am the author of VCI, a
Perl module that interacts with version control systems (currently CVS,
Svn, Hg, Git, and Bzr), and so I wanted to chime in a bit on this
thread.
The first thing to understand is that the git server protocol
is very
27 matches
Mail list logo
