Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.11.0

2009-05-12 Thread Carlos Garcia Campos
Poppler 0.11.0 has just been released. It's the first unstable release leading up to 0.12. It includes the new API needed to add support for annotations in Evince. Any objection? Thanks, -- Carlos Garcia Campos elkalm...@yahoo.es carlo...@gnome.org http://carlosgc.linups.org PGP

Re: Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.11.0

2009-05-12 Thread Frederic Peters
Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: Poppler 0.11.0 has just been released. It's the first unstable release leading up to 0.12. It includes the new API needed to add support for annotations in Evince. Any objection? I had a question about release schedule, but got the answer on the Poppler list

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-12 Thread Hubert Figuiere
In the prior discussion, there was a lot of discussion as to GJS v. Seed. Since then, compatibility between the two has improved a lot, notably with Seed adopting GJS's imports system. At this point, most GJS code could be pretty easily ported to Seed. Porting Seed code to GJS might be a bit

Re: Bump minimum version of poppler to 0.11.0

2009-05-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 12 mai 2009, à 12:40 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Carlos Garcia Campos wrote: Poppler 0.11.0 has just been released. It's the first unstable release leading up to 0.12. It includes the new API needed to add support for annotations in Evince. Any objection? I had a

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Carr
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Hubert Figuiere h...@figuiere.net wrote: In the prior discussion, there was a lot of discussion as to GJS v. Seed.  Since then, compatibility between the two has improved a lot, notably with Seed adopting GJS's imports system. At this point, most GJS code

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-12 Thread Hubert Figuiere
On 05/12/2009 08:01 PM, Robert Carr wrote: For 2.28, it may make sense to have both gjs and Seed as modules, and try and keep code somewhat compatible. It's still not entirely clear which JavaScript engine is going to end up being better long term, so we might not want to completely commit to

Re: New Module Proposal. libseed

2009-05-12 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Hubert Figuiere h...@figuiere.net wrote: On 05/12/2009 08:01 PM, Robert Carr wrote: For 2.28, it may make sense to have both gjs and Seed as modules, and try and keep code somewhat compatible. It's still not entirely clear which JavaScript engine is going to