On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 07:48 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> > I'd like to point out, though, that innovation cannot be driven by
> > looking at the past; if GNOME, and the Linux desktop, want to be
> > relevant with the users of today and tomorrow it cannot still be
> > anchored to hardware requ
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 07:43 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 08:03 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> > > the majority of GPUs, nowadays, work fine on
> > > Linux with open source drivers[1], and provide the basic
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 08:03 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> > the majority of GPUs, nowadays, work fine on
> > Linux with open source drivers[1], and provide the basic functionality
> > that Clutter requires[2].
>
> Except for some
Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> the majority of GPUs, nowadays, work fine on
> Linux with open source drivers[1], and provide the basic functionality
> that Clutter requires[2].
Except for some Intel cards, that's not true by a long shot. Only very
old ATI cards
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 23:55 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 12:12 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> > I'm sorry I'm posting it on wrong list.
>
> yes, you probably wanted to mail to desktop-devel-list instead of
> gnome-devel.
>
Ups. Sorry.
>
> > I'm usuing currently Gnome
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 12:12 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> I'm sorry I'm posting it on wrong list.
yes, you probably wanted to mail to desktop-devel-list instead of
gnome-devel.
> I'm usuing currently Gnome 2.27.x and I've become worried about new
> dependency - clutter.
>
> OpenGL traditional
