Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Willie Walker
Hi Owen: Many thanks for making this a formal proposal for comments. I think we all want to get behind GNOME Shell as a nice whiz-bang feature to make people want to move to GNOME 3. With the magnification support going into GNOME Shell, the accessibility team is also building in a dependency on

Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Seif Lotfy
2009/11/3 Owen Taylor > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:28 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: > > Owen: > > > > It sounds like GNOME Shell will likely not integrate with GNOME 2.30. > > > > How are users expected to turn on/enable GNOME Shell? At the Boston > > Summit, I remember people suggesting that there

Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Owen Taylor
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 16:28 -0600, Brian Cameron wrote: > Owen: > > It sounds like GNOME Shell will likely not integrate with GNOME 2.30. > > How are users expected to turn on/enable GNOME Shell? At the Boston > Summit, I remember people suggesting that there should be a checkbox in > the Prefer

Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Seif Lotfy
2009/11/2 Jamie McCracken > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:12 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > > > My initial understanding of the Zeitgeist engine was that it was > > a data collection engine to collect a rich view of how the user > > used their computer over time, which would then be used

Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Jamie McCracken
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:12 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > My initial understanding of the Zeitgeist engine was that it was > a data collection engine to collect a rich view of how the user > used their computer over time, which would then be used to build > an OLPC style journal i

Re: Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Brian Cameron
Owen: It sounds like GNOME Shell will likely not integrate with GNOME 2.30. How are users expected to turn on/enable GNOME Shell? At the Boston Summit, I remember people suggesting that there should be a checkbox in the Preferences->Appearance capplet that the user can check it to start using

Module semi-proposal: gnome-shell

2009-11-02 Thread Owen Taylor
Oh, the deadline was *last* Monday? Actually, I knew that, but it snuck up on me, then it took me a few days to figure out what I wanted to say here... This should be read as a semi-proposal: at this point I don't think gnome-shell is going to be ready to be shipped as a final component on the 2.3

Re: Bump telepathy-glib dependency to 0.9.0

2009-11-02 Thread Frederic Peters
Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > Empathy would like to take advantage[0] of the new account & account > manager client API that telepathy-glib 0.9.0 provides[1]. Currently, the > minimum version on the external dependencies wiki page is 0.7.31. Does > anyone have any problem moving this to 0.9.0 (ther

Bump telepathy-glib dependency to 0.9.0

2009-11-02 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Oh hi. Empathy would like to take advantage[0] of the new account & account manager client API that telepathy-glib 0.9.0 provides[1]. Currently, the minimum version on the external dependencies wiki page is 0.7.31. Does anyone have any problem moving this to 0.9.0 (there is no API/ABI breakage)?

gtk-doc and gobject introspection

2009-11-02 Thread Philippe Rouquier
Hi all, I tried to add gobject introspection to Brasero. I used the specs from here http://live.gnome.org/GObjectIntrospection/Annotations. The problem now is that gtk-doc creates a crippled documentation in which the GObject Introspection annotations are mixed up with the documentation. So I was